Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Veekay Surgicals Pvt Ltd vs M/S Aarushi Pharmaceuticals & ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 2327 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2327 Del
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2017

Delhi High Court
M/S Veekay Surgicals Pvt Ltd vs M/S Aarushi Pharmaceuticals & ... on 9 May, 2017
$~40
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                 DECIDED ON : MAY 09, 2017.

+                          CRL.M.C. 1830/2017

       M/S VEEKAY SURGICALS PVT LTD                        ..... Petitioner
                           Through :   Ms.Soumya Kumar, Advocate.
                           VERSUS
       M/S AARUSHI PHARMACEUTICALS & ANR. .... Respondents

                           Through :   None.


        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.No.7504/2017 (Exemption)

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 1830/2017

1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and propriety of an order dated 15.3.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in CR No.31/17 whereby order dated 25.10.2016 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate was upheld.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. On perusal of the record, I find no illegality or material irregularity in the impugned order. The respondent had been afforded an

additional opportunity by the learned Trial Court to produce defence evidence on medical grounds. The petitioner challenged the order in Revision which resulted in its dismissal. The Revisional court has taken into consideration all the relevant facts. The Trial Court has been directed not to grant any further opportunity to the respondent herein to lead defence evidence. The Trial Court has further been directed to decide the matter within one month. Revisional court further observed that before granting additional opportunity on medical grounds, the Trial Court should have sought supporting documents. The discretion exercised by the courts below is not arbitrary.

3. The Revision petition lacks merits and is dismissed in limine.

(S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY 09, 2017 sa

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter