Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukul Bhatia vs State
2017 Latest Caselaw 1165 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1165 Del
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2017

Delhi High Court
Mukul Bhatia vs State on 2 March, 2017
$~6
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                   DECIDED ON : 2nd MARCH, 2017

+                         CRL.M.C. 3830/2016
      MUKUL BHATIA                                        ..... Petitioner
                          Through :       Mr.Parth Goswami, Advocate.

                          versus

      STATE                                               ..... Respondent
                          Through :       Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI
                                          Sandeep Kumar, PS Rani Bagh.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 30.09.2016 in case FIR No.942/14 registered under Sections 420/34 IPC at PS Rani Bagh whereby the permission to travel USA was declined. Status report / Additional Status report are on record.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. It is informed that after the registration of the FIR the petitioner has travelled abroad and has returned. The present petition for permission to travel abroad after getting bail has been filed.

3. Learned APP states that the documents filed by the petitioner has since been verified and found genuine. Charge-sheet has yet not been

filed. The petitioner is a senior citizen and intends to visit his family members settled in USA. Telephone number of his son has been provided to facilitate his availability during his visit abroad.

4. In the interest of justice and to enable the petitioner to visit abroad to meet his family members, he is granted permission to travel from 25.04.2017 to 22.07.2017 on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `1 lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court subject to the condition that he shall furnish the detailed itinerary to the Investigating Officer. On return, he shall intimate the Investigating Agency / Trial Court within a week.

5. The petition stands disposed of.

(S.P.GARG) JUDGE MARCH 02, 2017 / tr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter