Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Salim & Anr vs Shabina Begum
2017 Latest Caselaw 99 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 99 Del
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2017

Delhi High Court
Salim & Anr vs Shabina Begum on 7 January, 2017
$~1
*         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+         RFA 847/2016
          SALIM & ANR                                       ..... Appellants
                               Through: Mr. Manu Parashar, Advocate with
                               appellant No.1 in person.

                               versus

          SHABINA BEGUM                           ..... Respondent
                      Through: Mr. Javed Ahmed and Mr. Anis Ahmed,
                      Advocates.

          CORAM:
          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

                               ORDER

% 07.02.2017

1. The appellant/defendant No.1 is aggrieved by the judgment dated 04.8.2016 passed by the learned trial court in a suit for possession, mesne profit, damages and permanent injunction instituted by the respondent/plaintiff, who happens to be the sister-in-law (elder brother's wife of the appellant).

2. Under the impugned judgment, the learned trial court passed a decree of possession and permanent injunction in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the appellants/defendants and awarded damages/mesne profit against the appellants/defendants @ Rs.4,000 per month from the date of institution of the suit i.e. with effect from 22.4.2014, till the date of handing over possession thereof alongwith 8% interest and costs of the suit.

3. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants fairly states that instead of pressing the appeal on merits, the appellant may be granted one month's time to vacate the suit premises. He further states that the respondent may be called upon not to insist on the interest awarded on the principal amount decreed in her favour and waive the costs of the suit.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff states in all fairness that if the appellants/defendant hand over the vacant peaceful possession of the suit premises to the respondent/plaintiff on or before 10.3.2017 and pay the principal amount as decreed under the impugned judgment dated 04.8.2016, his client shall forego the interest component and not insist on recovery of the costs of the suit. He assures the court that his client shall not press the execution petition till 10.3.2017.

5. In view of the submissions made herein above, the present appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

6. The appellants/defendants are granted time upto 10.3.2017 to vacate the suit premises. The appellants/defendants shall hand over the vacant peaceful possession of the suit premises to the respondent/plaintiff by 10.3.2017, against receipt. They shall clear all the outstanding electricity and water charges and hand over proof of payment to the respondent/plaintiff by the cut-off date. The appellants/defendants shall also pay the principal amount awarded in favour of the respondent/plaintiff, on or before 10.3.2017.

7. If the appellants/defendants adhere to the settlement recorded hereinabove, then the respondent/plaintiff shall waive the interest and the costs of the suit awarded in her favour. In the event of default, the

respondent/plaintiff shall be entitled to seek execution of the impugned judgment and decree, as it stands.

8. While binding the parties to the settlement recorded above, the appeal is disposed of.

HIMA KOHLI, J

FEBRUARY 07, 2017 ap

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter