Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravinder Parkash Punj vs The New Delhi Municipal Council & ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 956 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 956 Del
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2017

Delhi High Court
Ravinder Parkash Punj vs The New Delhi Municipal Council & ... on 17 February, 2017
$~31
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      W.P.(C) 1344/2017 & CMs 6128-29/2017
       RAVINDER PARKASH PUNJ                   ..... Petitioner
                   Through : Mr. Anoop Bhambani, Sr. Advocate
                   with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocate

                           versus

       THE NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS
                                                           ..... Respondents
                           Through : Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate for NDMC.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
                    ORDER

% 17.02.2017

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the assessment order dated 12.5.2016 whereunder, the existing rateable value in respect of property bearing No.10, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi has been assessed at a new rateable value for the period w.e.f. 2004-2005 till 2015-2016.

2. In view of the fact that the statute provides for an alternate efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, as contemplated under Section 115 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (in short 'the Act'), this court is of the opinion that the petitioner ought to first approach the said forum for appropriate relief.

3. Mr. Bhambani, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner states on instructions, that the petitioner shall approach the Appellate

Authority under Section 115 of the Act and request the said court to permit him to deposit the property tax payable for one assessment year for laying a challenge to the impugned order dated 12.5.2016 whereunder, the rateable value in respect of the subject property has been revised at one go, for several years. Such a request, if made, shall be considered by the appellate authority and a decision taken in accordance with law.

4. Counsel for the respondent No.1/NDMC, who appears on advance copy, states that if the petitioner files an appeal against the assessment order, then the respondent/NDMC reserves its right to challenge its maintainability on the ground of delay, under Sections 116 & 117 of the Act.

5. The present petition is accordingly disposed of, along with the pending applications, with liberty granted to the petitioner to invoke the provisions of Section 115 of the NDMC Act.

HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY 17, 2017 sk/mk/ap

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter