Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Puran Chand Arya vs Union Of India & Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 7179 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7179 Del
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2017

Delhi High Court
Puran Chand Arya vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017
$~8 & 9
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                    Date of decision : 12th December, 2017

+      W.P.(C) 10536/2016, CM Nos.41378/2016 & 24702/2017

       AVADH KAUSHIK                                       ..... Petitioner
                   Through :                 Petitioner in person.

                              versus

       UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                           ..... Respondents
                     Through :               Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.
                                             Nivesh Sharma, Adv. for R-
                                             1&2.
                                             Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for
                                             GNCTD with Mr. Rhishabh
                                             Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan,
                                             Advs. for GNCTD.
+      W.P.(C) 10540/2016

       PURAN CHAND ARYA                                ..... Petitioner
                   Through :                 Mr. Abhishek Choudhary and
                                             Mr. Rajeev Kumar Yadav,
                                             Advs.
                              versus

       UNION OF INDIA & ORS                            ..... Respondents
                     Through :               Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla,
                                             CGSC with Mr. Kamal deep,
                                             Adv. for UOI.
                                             Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for
                                             GNCTD with Mr. Rhishabh
                                             Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan,
                                             Advs. for GNCTD.
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE




W.P.(C)Nos.10536/2016 & 10540/2016                                   Page 1 of 3
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

1. These two writ petitions were filed complaining against the action of the Government of NCT of Delhi declaring Ex-Serviceman Ram Kishan Grewal, who committed suicide during protest at Jantar Mantar in November, 2016 over the issue of grant of "one rank- one pension", as a 'martyr'.

2. The petitioner complains that the Government of NCT of Delhi had announced an ex-gratia amount of Rs.1 crore for his family. This writ petition seeks quashing and setting aside of the decision of the GNCTD holding the deceased as martyr, the award of the said compensation as well as the decision to grant any job to his family member in the Delhi Administration on compassionate grounds.

3. Government of NCT of Delhi - impleaded as respondent no.4 (in WP(C)No.10536/2016) has filed a counter affidavit placing before this court the Cabinet decision No.2446 dated 4th November, 2016 approving the release of amount of Rs.1 crore to the family member of the deceased Subedar Ram Kishan Grewal (Retd.) and Cabinet decision No.2455 dated 8th December, 2016 deciding to make an exception to the ex-gratia scheme to war widows, war disabled PoWs, missing in war/operation etc of defence personnel.

However, both the decisions have not been approved by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.

4. Respondent no.4/GNCTD has further informed this court that

the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi has directed the Ministry of Home Affairs of the Government of India and the Ministry of Defence to examine of the proposal of the Government of NCT of Delhi.

5. Although, the petitioner may have flagged an important issue regarding the manner in which public funds would be dispensed, given the fact that the respondents are not implementing their decisions, we are not required to comment on this aspect of the matter. It would therefore, appear that the apprehensions of the petitioner are premature at this stage and inasmuch as the said impugned decisions are not being implemented.

These writ petitions are therefore, not maintainable and are hereby dismissed.

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

C.HARI SHANKAR, J DECEMBER 12, 2017 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter