Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kusum Lata vs Delhi Transport Corporation And ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 7093 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7093 Del
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2017

Delhi High Court
Kusum Lata vs Delhi Transport Corporation And ... on 7 December, 2017
$~3
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                         W.P.(C)No.7572/2017

%                            Date of decision : 7th December, 2017

       KUSUM LATA                          ..... Petitioner

                          Through :   Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Mrs.
                                      Sudha Rani Saxena and Mr.
                                      Priyanshu Upadhyay, Advs.

                          versus

       DELHI TRANSPORT
       CORPORATION AND ORS                  ..... Respondents
                    Through :         Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.
                                      for R-1/DTC.
                                      Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for
                                      R-2/GNCTD.
                                      Mr. Shambhu, Adv. for R-3.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

1. This writ petition makes a general prayer that there are some employees working in the Delhi Transport Corporation, who have submitted fake proof of age and as a result, they are continuing in service even after completing the prescribed retirement age. In this

regard, the petitioner has enclosed certificates relating to one employee of the Delhi Transport Corporation.

2. Ms. Aditi Gupta, ld. counsel representing the respondent no.1 - Delhi Transport Corporation has placed before us the notings dated 20th November, 2017 and 29th November, 2017 which manifest that the respondent no.1 has initiated inquiry into the certificates produced by the petitioner along with the writ petition. Ms. Aditi Gupta, ld. counsel for respondent no.1 states that premised on the outcome of inquiry, necessary action would be taken in accordance with law.

3. In view of the fact that the respondent no.1 - Delhi Transport Corporation is taking action in accordance with law on the complaint made by the petitioner, this writ petition need not detain us any further.

This writ petition is hereby disposed of.

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

C.HARI SHANKAR, J DECEMBER 07, 2017 aj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter