Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi vs M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd
2017 Latest Caselaw 7087 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7087 Del
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2017

Delhi High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi vs M/S. Maruti Udyog Ltd on 7 December, 2017
$~
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+                         ITA No. 638/2009
                                       Reserved on: 11th November 2017
                                        Decided on: 7th December, 2017

       COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI           ...Appellant
                   Through: Mr. Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr.
                            Sanjay Kumar, Advocates.


                                 versus


       M/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD.                       ..... Respondent
                     Through : Mr. S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with
                               Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. S. Sukumaran,
                               Mr. Anand Sukumar, Mr. Bhuwan
                               Dhoopar, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr.
                               Bhupesh Pathak, Advocates.

       CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
              JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
                               JUDGMENT
%                              07.12.2017
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:

1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 5th September 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal („ITAT‟) in ITA No. 1438/Del/2004 for the AY 2000-01.

2. While admitting this appeal on 28th January 2010, the following question of law was framed for consideration:

"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in deleting the addition of Rs

8,90,68,752/- out of total addition of Rs 53,05,13,971/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of alleged excess consumption inputs of raw materials and components shown by the Assessee?"

3. In view of the decision of this Court today in ITA No. 250 of 2005, the aforesaid question is answered in the negative, i.e. in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.

4. ITA No. 638 of 2009 is, therefore, dismissed.

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

DECEMBER 07, 2017 Rm

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter