Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarabjeet Singh And Anr. vs State Election Commission And Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 6430 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6430 Del
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2016

Delhi High Court
Sarabjeet Singh And Anr. vs State Election Commission And Ors on 6 October, 2016
$~24.
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+       W.P.(C) 7672/2016
        SARABJEET SINGH AND ANR.                 ..... Petitioners
                     Through: Mr. A.Maitri and
                     Ms.Radhika Chandershekhar, Advocates

                           versus

        STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. ..... Respondents
                     Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna and
                     Mr.Siddhartha Nagpal, Adovcates with
                     Mr.Arora, Consultant/SEC in person
                     Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for R-2/ECI

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

                           ORDER

% 06.10.2016

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondent No.1/SEC not to finalize, notify the delimitation of Municipal Ward No.69 Chattarpurt(part of Assembly No.46) in contravention of Section 9(1)(a) of Delimitation Act, 2002.

2. Mr.Pushkarna, learned counsel for the respondent No.1/SEC states that much water has flown since the filing the present petition, inasmuch as the draft delimitation order in respect of the subject ward has already been issued by the respondent No.1/SEC on 10.9.2016 and any party being aggrieved by the said order, was required to file the suggestions within fifteen days from the date of publication of the said order, i.e., on or before

24.9.2016.

3. Mr.Maitri, learned counsel for the petitioners states that 90% of the grievance raised by the petitioners has been addressed in the draft delimitation order and as for the remaining objections, the petitioners have submitted their suggestions within the prescribed time of fifteen days.

4. That being so, it is now for the respondent No.1/SEC to consider all the suggestions, if filed within the prescribed timeline, in accordance with law.

5. The present petition is disposed of.

HIMA KOHLI, J OCTOBER 06, 2016 mk/ap

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter