Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4123 Del
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 783/2015
Reserved on 26th April, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 30th May, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
Sundeep Import Export Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company
WITH
Newgen Software Technologies Limited
Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Saurabh Kalia, Advocate
for the petitioner
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
of Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Ashish Makhija, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner/transferor company seeking
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Sundeep Import Export
Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner/transferor
company) with Newgen Software Technologies Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the petitioner/transferor company and the
transferee company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
3. The petitioner/transferor company was originally incorporated
under the Companies Act, 1956 on 26th March, 1972 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of Sundeep Import Export Private Limited. The word 'Private' was
deleted from the name of the company w.e.f. 31.03.2000. The company
changed its name to Sundeep Import Export Private Limited and
obtained the fresh certificate of incorporation on 24th March, 2015.
4. The present authorized share capital of the petitioner/transferor
company is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 5,000 equity shares of Rs.100/-
each aggregating. The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share
capital of the company is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 5,000 equity shares
of Rs.100/- each aggregating.
5. A copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
petitioner/transferor company has been filed on record with the
application being CA(M) 149/2015 earlier filed by the petitioner. The
audited balance sheet, as on 31st March, 2015, of petitioner/transferor
company, along with the report of the auditors, had also been filed.
6. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by
the petitioner that the proposed amalgamation will reduce managerial
overlap, reduce administrative cost and strengthened leadership in the
industry, in terms of asset base and revenue. It is further claimed that the
proposed amalgamation will improve organizational capabilities and
leadership, arising from pooling of assets, human capital and technical
resources to compete successfully in an increasingly competitive
industry.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that since the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary
of the transferee company, no consideration shall be payable by the
transferee company pursuant to the amalgamation of the transferor
company with the transferee company, and accordingly the entire
investment in the transferor company held by the transferee company
would stand cancelled.
8. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner/transferor company and the transferee company.
9. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 17th July, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
10. The petitioner/transferor company had earlier filed CA (M) No.
149/2015 seeking directions of this court to dispense with the
requirement of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders,
secured and unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 21st
September, 2015 this court allowed the application and dispensed with
the requirement of convening and holding the meetings of the equity
shareholders and unsecured creditors of the petitioner/transferor
company, there being no secured creditor of the transferor company, to
consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide the said order, this Court also
dispensed with the requirement of filing a separate petition by the
transferee company.
11. The petitioner/transferor company has thereafter filed the present
petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order
dated 15th October, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued
to the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator.
Citations were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard'
(English) and (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the
petitioners showing compliance regarding service on the Official
Liquidator and the Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding
publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 19th November,
2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have
been filed along with the said affidavit.
12. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 22nd January,
2016 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor company do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
13. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 5th February, 2016 stating that the ROC
in his report has not made any adverse comments to the Scheme of
Amalgamation and that the Regional Director has no objection to the
proposed Scheme.
14. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner company, in the affidavit dated 7th
April, 2016 of Mr. Aman, authorized signatory of the transferee company
has submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their counsel
have received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the
newspapers on 19th November, 2015.
15. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner company to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region and the Official Liquidator not having raised any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2015, the transferor
company shall stand dissolved without undergoing the process of winding
up.
16. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.50,000/- should be paid by the petitioner keeping in view the fact
that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and also
prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company states
that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order dated
26.04.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- by way of
costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
17. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
May 30, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!