Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Philco Overseas Limited vs ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4122 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4122 Del
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2016

Delhi High Court
Philco Overseas Limited vs ... on 30 May, 2016
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                   COMPANY PETITION NO. 451/2015

                                            Reserved on 26th April, 2016
                                 Date of pronouncement: 30th May, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

Philco Overseas Limited
                                             Petitioner/Transferor Company
      WITH

Superfreeze India Limited
                                            Petitioner/Transferee Company

                                 Through Mr. Tariq Muneer and Mr.A.
                                 Singh, Advocates for the petitioners
                                 Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
                                 of Companies for the Regional Director
                                 Mr. Ashish Makhija, Advocate for the
                                 Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of

the Scheme of Amalgamation of Philco Overseas Limited (hereinafter

referred to as the transferor company) with Superfreeze India Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The transferor company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on on 25th October, 1994 with the Registrar of Companies,

NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on 24th July, 1996 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of

Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

5. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company is

Rs.50,00,000/- divided into 5,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The

issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.14,50,000/- divided into 1,45,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully

paid-up.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.1,75,00,000/- divided into 17,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.1,68,36,000/- divided into 16,83,600 equity shares of Rs.10/- each

fully paid-up.

7. Copies of Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the

joint application being CA(M) 41/2015 earlier filed by the petitioners. The

audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor

company, along with the report of the auditors, and the audited balance

sheet, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferee company had also been

filed.

8. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on

record and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated

and detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed

by the petitioners that the proposed Amalgamation would result in

consolidation and simplification of the group structure; reducing

operational and compliance costs, achieving operational and

management efficiency; and synergies arising out of consolidation of

business, such as, enhancement of net worth of the combined business

to capitalize on future growth potential, optimal utilization of resources.

9. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee

company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the

transferor companies as under:-

"10,97,000 fully paid up equity shares of Rs.10/- each in the share capital of the transferee company in the proportion of the number of equity shares held by the shareholders in the transferor company."

The petitioners have also placed on record the affidavit dated 17th

March, 2016 of Mr. Sanjeev Maini, director of the transferor company

showing the ratio in which the shareholders of the transferor company

will get shares in the transferee company, post amalgamation. Further,

they have also placed on record the individual affidavit of each

shareholder of the transferee company acknowledging the share

exchange ratio.

10. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

petitioner companies.

11. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies

in their separate meetings held on 10th March, 2014 have unanimously

approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the

Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the

transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.

12. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 41/2015

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 8th May, 2015 this court

allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening

and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the transferor

company and equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the

transferee company, there being no secured or unsecured creditors of

the transferor company and no secured creditor of the transferee

company, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without

modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

13. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 16th

July, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Statesman' (English) and 'Veer

Arjun' (Hindi) editions. Affidavits have been filed by the petitioners

showing compliance publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers

on 8th October, 2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the

publications have been filed along with the said affidavit.

14. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 9th December,

2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint

against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party

interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the

transferor company do not appear to have been conducted in a manner

prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as

per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

15. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 14th December, 2015. Relying on Clause

8.1 of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme of

Arrangement, all the employees of the transferor company shall become

the employees of the transferee company without any break or

interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in Clause

13.1.1 of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee company

shall follow the method of accounting as prescribed for the pooling of

interest method under Accounting Standard-14 issued as notified under

the Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules, 2006. He further submitted

that in Clause 15.1 of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon this

scheme becoming effective, the transferor company shall stand dissolved

without the process of winding up.

16. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 19th

December, 2015 of Mr. Sanjeev Mani, director of the petitioner

companies have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their

counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations published

in the newspapers on 8th October, 2015.

17. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of

the petitioner companies, there being no creditors of the petitioner

companies, to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation and the affidavits

filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator

having not raised any objection to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of

sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is

hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and

394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply

with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of

this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is

also clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting

exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with

law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of

Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor company shall stand

dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up.

18. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at

least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the

fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and

also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company

states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order

dated 26.04.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by

way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.

19. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

May 30, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter