Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4043 Del
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2016
$~9. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 355/2016
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. S.C. Malhotra, Advocate with
Ms. Dona Dutta, Advocate
versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE
(DIETY) & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate with
Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocate and Mr. S. Sukumar
N.K, S.O., NIC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 26.05.2016
1. The present petition has been listed by the Registry, subject to an office objection with regard to its maintainability and with an observation that the petitioners should have approached the Central Administrative Tribunal for appropriate relief against the respondents/National Informatics Centre.
2. Counsel for the petitioners concedes that NIC is a part of the list of Departments/Public Sector Undertakings governed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, as displayed on the website of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
3. In these circumstances, this Court declines to entertain the present petition. The same is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, for appropriate relief.
HIMA KOHLI, J MAY 26, 2016/rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!