Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4040 Del
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2016
$~1.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 2969/2016
BEERABAHADUR YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Yadav, Advocate
versus
UOI AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate with
Mr. Gaurang Bindra, Advocate for R-1/UOI.
Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr. Vishu
Agarwal, Advocate for R-2/AAI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 26.05.2016
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia
for quashing the evaluation of the answer keys by the respondent No.2/AAI
and further, to consider the evaluation of the incorrect answer keys of the
examination conducted by them in respect of Junior Executive ATC, held on
26.12.2015.
2. Ms. Gosain, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/AAI, who
appears on advance notice, states at the outset that the present petition has
been rendered infructuous for the reason that after the same was filed on
28.03.2016, the respondents had revised the answer keys on 04.04.2016 and
displayed the same on their website with a note that if any candidate had any
objection, they should respond within seven days. She states that the
petitioner did not respond thereafter and in any case, out of the seven
answer keys that the petitioner claims were incorrect, four were corrected by
the respondents and resultantly, his marks were upgraded. Thereafter, the
petitioner had qualified for the interview, which process has been concluded
on 21.05.2016 and now the results are awaited.
3. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted
to withdraw the present petition.
4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
HIMA KOHLI, J MAY 26, 2016 rkb/mk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!