Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bidyut Roy vs State ( Nct Of Delhi)
2016 Latest Caselaw 3759 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3759 Del
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2016

Delhi High Court
Bidyut Roy vs State ( Nct Of Delhi) on 18 May, 2016
#1
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                 Date of decision: 18.05.2016

+      BAIL APPLN. 719/2016

       BIDYUT ROY                                  .....Applicant
                          Through      Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate along
                                       with applicant
                          versus

       STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)                      ..... Respondent

Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP for State SI Uma Dutt, PS Mangol Puri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present is an application under section 438 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking

pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 408/2015, under Section 27 of Delhi Medical

Council Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), registered at Police

Station- Mangol Puri, Delhi.

2. It is alleged in the subject FIR that the applicant is practicing the

modern scientific system of medicine without requisite qualification, in

violation of the provision of Section 27 of the Act.

3. Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

applicant, on instructions from the latter, who is present in Court today,

states that the aforesaid allegation is false and that the applicant has, at no

stage, practiced the modern scientific system of medicine in violation of

Section 27 of the Act.

4. In other words, it is urged that the applicant has been falsely

implicated in the subject FIR.

5. Mr. M.S. Oberoi, learned APP appearing on behalf of the official

respondent, fairly concedes that the applicant has joined investigation.

6. In the present case, it is observed that the applicant has clean

antecedents. At this stage, there is neither any hint nor allegation that the

applicant shall not be available to stand trial or that he may attempt to tamper

with the evidence or try to influence the witnesses in the subject FIR.

7. In view of the foregoing, the present bail application is allowed.

8. In the event of applicant's arrest, he shall be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one local surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Station House

In-charge subject to the further conditions:-

(i) That he shall continue to co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for questioning to a Police Officer as and when called upon to do so.

(ii) That the applicant shall not leave the NCT of Delhi without prior permission of this Court.

(iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the present case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any other authority.

9. With the above directions, the present bail application is allowed and

disposed of.

10. Dasti.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 18, 2016 SD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter