Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3631 Del
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 836/2015
Reserved on 3rd May, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 16th May, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
DCM Engineering Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company
WITH
DCM Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Mahesh Agarwal and
Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Advocates for the
petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
of Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Section 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of
the Scheme of Amalgamation of DCM Engineering Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferor company) with DCM Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 5th September, 1990 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of DCM Precision Engineering Private Limited. The company
changed its name to DCM Precision Engineering Limited and obtained
the fresh certificate of incorporation on 5th February, 1998. The company
again changed its name to DCM Engineering Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 23rd March, 2004.
4. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1882 on 26th March, 1889 with the
Registrar, Joint Stock Companies, Punjab under the name and style of
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Company Limited. The company changed its
name to DCM Limited and obtained a certificate in this regard from the
Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi on 6th
October, 1983.
5. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company is
Rs.24,00,00,000/- divided into 2,39,99,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each
aggregating to Rs.23,99,90,000/- and 100 13.50% redeemable
cumulative preference shares of Rs.100/- each aggregating to
Rs.10,000/-. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.20,05,00,000/- divided into 2,00,50,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each fully paid up.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.80,00,00,000/- divided into 6,00,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each
aggregating to Rs.60,00,00,000/-; 3,20,000 9.5% - 6th redeemable
cumulative preference shares of Rs.25/- each aggregating to
Rs.80,00,000/-; 36,80,000 preference shares of Rs.25/- each
aggregating to Rs.9,20,00,000/- and 10,00,000 cumulative convertible
preference shares of Rs.100/- each aggregating to Rs.10,00,00,000/-.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.17,37,59,195/- divided into 1,73,79,037 equity shares of Rs.10/- each
fully paid up aggregating to Rs.17,37,90,370/- less calls in arrears of
Rs.31,175/-.
7. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 130/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor
and transferee companies, along with the reports of the auditors, had
also been filed.
8. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It has been
submitted by the petitioners that the transferor company is a subsidiary of
the transferee company which holds approx. 75.06% of the share capital
of the transferor company. It is claimed that the proposed Scheme would
result in creation of a single entity with better financial strength which
would result in improving the competitive position of the businesses of
the combined entity. It is further claimed that the proposed amalgamation
would result in consolidation of the businesses presently being carried on
by the transferor company and the transferee company would help in
diversification of business risks and would also help in cost optimization
in the system.
9. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor company in the following ratio:
"20 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 77 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held by the shareholders in the transferor company."
10. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 or under Sections 210,
212(1) to (7) & (11) to (17), 214, 215, 216(1) & (3), 217, 219, 220, 223,
224(1), (3) and (4) and 225 or any other applicable provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013 are pending against the petitioner companies.
11. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 8th December, 2014 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
12. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 130/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meeting of the equity shareholders of the transferor
company and for convening of separate meetings of the secured and
unsecured creditors of the transferor company and equity shareholders,
secured and unsecured creditors of the transferee company, which are
statutorily required for sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide
order dated 1st September, 2015 this court allowed the application and
dispensed with the requirement of convening and holding the meeting of
the equity shareholders of the transferor company and directed
convening of separate meetings of the secured and unsecured creditors
of the transferor company and equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors of the transferee company, to consider and, if
thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme
of Amalgamation.
13. The Chairpersons of the ordered meetings of the secured and
unsecured creditors of the transferor company and equity shareholders,
secured and unsecured creditors of the transferee company have filed
their reports stating that the meetings were duly held on 17th October,
2015, as directed, and that the Scheme of Amalgamation has been
approved unanimously by the secured and unsecured creditors of the
transferor company and equity shareholders, secured and unsecured
creditors of the transferee company, present and voting, in the meetings.
14. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 5th
November, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
(Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners
showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the
Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of
citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 14th January, 2016. Copies of
the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed
along with the said affidavit.
15. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 26th February,
2016 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor company do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
16. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 15th March, 2016 stating that the ROC in
his report has not made any adverse comments to the Scheme of
Amalgamation and that the Regional Director has no objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
17. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavits dated
18th March, 2016 of Mr. Apil Agarwal, authorized signatory of the
transferor company and Mr. Ashwani Singhal, authorized signatory of the
transferee company have submitted that neither the petitioner companies
nor their counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations
published in the newspapers on 14th January,2016.
18. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region and the Official Liquidator having not raised any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor
company shall stand dissolved without undergoing the process of winding
up.
19. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 03.05.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
20. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
May 16, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!