Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3625 Del
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 716/2015
Reserved on 18th April, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 16th May, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 67 to 87
of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
Trans American Travels (India) Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company
WITH
Trans American Information Systems Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Arun Saxena with
Mr.Simranjyot Singh, Advocates for
the petitioners
Mr. Sanjay Bose, Dy. Registrar of
Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 67 to 87 of the Companies (Court)
Rules, 1959 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of the Scheme
of Amalgamation of Trans American Travels (India) Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with Trans American
Information Systems Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company was incorporated under the Companies
Act, 1956 on 10th November, 1995 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT
of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies
Act, 1956 on 5th March, 1999 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of
Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company is
Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The
present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.4,90,000/- divided into 49,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The
present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.4,10,200/- divided into 41,020 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
7. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 122/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014 of the transferor and
transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also
been filed.
8. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by
the petitioners that the proposed amalgamation would result in business
synergy and consolidation of these companies into one large company
with a stronger asset base. It is further claimed that the proposed
amalgamation will result in usual economies of a centralized and a large
company including elimination of duplicate work, reduction in overheads,
better and more productive utilization of human and other resources and
enhancement of overall business efficiency. It will enable these
companies to combine their managerial and operating strength, to build a
wider capital and financial base and to promote and secure overall
growth of their businesses.
9. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that the transferee company shall issue and allot equity shares
to the shareholders of the transferor company in the following ratio:
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company for every 02 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held by the shareholders in the transferor company."
10. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
11. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 30th April, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
12. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 122/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 3rd August, 2015 this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the transferor and
transferee companies, there being no secured or unsecured creditors of
the petitioner companies, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or
without modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
13. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 21st
September, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
'Jansatta' (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the
petitioners showing compliance regarding service on the Official
Liquidator and the Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding
publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 20 th October,
2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have
been filed along with the said affidavit.
14. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 16th February,
2016 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor company do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
15. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 17th February, 2016 stating that the ROC
in his report has not made any adverse comments to the Scheme of
Amalgamation.
16. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 15th
February, 2016 of Mr. Rabindar Kumar Mahato, director of the petitioner
companies have submitted that they have not received any objection
pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers on 20th October,
2015.
17. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of
the petitioner companies, there being no creditors of the petitioner
companies, to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation and the affidavits
filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator
having not raised any objection to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of
sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is
hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and
394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply
with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of
this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is
also clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting
exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with
law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of
Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor company shall stand
dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up.
18. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 18.04.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
19. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
May 16, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!