Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Kumar vs State ( Nct Of Delhi) & Anr
2016 Latest Caselaw 3598 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3598 Del
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2016

Delhi High Court
Anil Kumar vs State ( Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 13 May, 2016
33
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                Date of decision: 13th May, 2016

W.P.(CRL) 1510/2016 & CRL.M.A. 7867/2016

ANIL KUMAR                                                        ..... Petitioner

                                 Through:   Mr Vikram Panwar, Advocate.

                                 versus

STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR                                    ..... Respondents

Through: Mr Ashish Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) .

Mr Manoj Pant, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

SI Anil Kumar, PS- Dwarka South.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

seeking quashing of FIR No.69/2014 under Sections 307 IPC registered at

Police Station-Dwarka South, Delhi.

2. Notice. Mr Ashish Aggarawal, learned Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.),

accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent and does not oppose this

petition.

3. The subject FIR came to be registered as consequence of an argument

between the petitioner-husband and the complainant-wife. It is stated by

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that his licensed

weapon went off accidently and the bullet expelled therefrom brushed across

the thighs of the complainant. However, the injuries suffered by the

complainant are opined to be simple.

4. The complainant, who is present in person in court and has been

identified by the IO in the subject FIR, namely, SI Anil Kumar, PS- Dwarka

South, states that she has forgiven her husband; and that in order to keep the

family together which also consists of their two children aged 18 and 16

years respectively, she wishes to live happily with him; and that the present

FIR has the potential to complicate and jeopardize her family life; and that,

therefore, she is no longer keen to prosecute the subject FIR.

5. It is observed that the present case does not fall within the categories

exempted from quashing in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in

Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303,

since it does not affect the general public at large and is a private affair.

6. In view of the foregoing, the present writ petition is allowed. FIR

No.69/2014 under Sections 307 IPC registered at Police Station-Dwarka

South, Delhi is hereby set aside and quashed qua the petitioner subject to his

making himself available for community service at the Hanuman Mandir,

Sector-6, Dwarka, Delhi, on every Saturday between 6.00 AM to 10.00 AM

for four consecutive weeks. The management of the concerned Hanuman

Mandir is requested to utilize the services of the petitioner herein in any

manner they deem fit for the said purpose. The management is requested to

furnish the IO in the subject FIR, with a report qua the conduct and

demeanour of the petitioner herein, at the expiry of the aforesaid period of

four weeks.

7. With the above directions the writ petition is allowed and disposed of

accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 13, 2016 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter