Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3171 Del
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2016
#41
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 02.05.2016
+ W.P.(CRL) 1346/2016 & CRL.M.A No. 7079/2016
ANIL KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through Ms. Saroj Bala, Advocate along with
petitioners
versus
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Ashish Negi for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl.) SI Mukesh Kumar, PS Jaffarpur Kalan Respondent no. 2/Complainant in-
person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A No. 7079/2016 (Exemption)
1. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of accordingly.
W.P.(CRL) 1346/2016
1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)
seeking quashing of FIR No. 195/2014, under Sections 332/341/506/34 IPC,
registered at Police Station- Jaffarpur Kalan, Delhi.
2. The subject FIR came to be registered on an allegation levelled by
Deven, respondent no. 2/complainant herein alleging that the petitioners who
were hitherto his friends, had assaulted him on 16 th August, 2014 over a
trivial difference of opinion.
3. Deven, the respondent no. 2/complainant herein, who is present in
court today and has been identified by the IO in the subject FIR, namely, SI
Mukesh Kumar, Police Station- Jaffarpur Kalan, Delhi, states that the
misunderstanding that led to the registration of the subject FIR has since
been resolved amicably between the parties and that the old friends have
since buried the hatchet, and consequently, he is no longer keen to proceed
with the subject FIR.
4. In the present case, it is observed that the injuries suffered by Deven,
the respondent no. 2/complainant herein are opined to be simple.
5. The parties to the present petition are old school mates and the present
petition has the potential to blight the fledgling careers of the petitioners,
who are young adults.
6. The petitioners herein, who are also present in Court today, have also
expressed deep remorse at the incident and assure this Court that there shall
not be a repetition. They undertake to maintain good conduct for a period of
one year from today.
7. In view of the foregoing, since the dispute that led to the registration
of the subject FIR has been resolved amicably by and between the parties
without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, no useful purpose will be
served by proceeding with the subject FIR.
8. Resultantly, FIR No. 195/2014, under Sections 332/341/506/34 IPC,
registered at Police Station- Jaffarpur Kalan, Delhi is hereby set aside and
quashed qua the petitioners subject to all of them making themselves
available for community service at the Sai Baba Mandir, Najafgarh, Delhi on
every Saturday between 6.00 AM to 9.00 AM for four consecutive weeks.
The management of the concerned Sai Baba Mandir is requested to utilize
the services of the petitioners herein in any manner they deem fit for the said
purpose. The management is requested to furnish the IO in the subject FIR,
with a report qua the conduct and demeanour of the petitioners herein, at the
expiry of the aforesaid period of four weeks.
9. With the above directions, the present writ petition is allowed and
disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 02, 2016 sd
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!