Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagdish Chander & Ors vs Nct Of Delhi & Anr
2016 Latest Caselaw 2471 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2471 Del
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2016

Delhi High Court
Jagdish Chander & Ors vs Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 30 March, 2016
#34
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                 Date of decision: 30.03.2016

W.P.(CRL) 1027/2016


JAGDISH CHANDER & ORS                                 ..... Petitioners
                           Through:     Mr. M.K. Saroja and Mr. Ravi Kant,
                                        Advocates


                           versus


NCT OF DELHI & ANR                                        ..... Respondents

Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC (Criminal) with ASI Surender Singh, PS- Khyala for R-1 Ms. Anita Verma, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A.5341/2016 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(CRL) 1027/2016

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)

seeking quashing of FIR No.28/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC,

registered at Police Station- Khyala, Delhi and the proceedings arising

therefrom.

2. The facts in brief are that on 22.11.2011 the petitioner No.1 married

respondent No.2 according to Hindu customs, rites and ceremonies in Delhi.

One female child namely, Rishika was born out of the said wedlock, who is

in the care and custody of respondent No.2. Owing to ideological and

temperamental differences the parties to the marriage have been living

separately since 13.07.2013. On a complaint filed by the respondent No.2

(wife) against her husband (petitioner No.1) and his family members, the

subject FIR was registered.

3. Eventually, better sense prevailed and the parties have decided to

settle all their matrimonial disputes with the assistance of respectable elders

and common relatives and it was orally agreed that petitioner No.1 will pay

Rs.4,10,000/- in total to respondent No.2 towards past, present and future

alimony. Respondent No.2/complainant Mamta has filed an affidavit in

support of the present petition, which is annexed as Annexure P-3 to the

following effect:-

"AFFIDAVIT

I, Mamta w/o Jagdish Chander d/o Shri Kailash Chand aged about 27 years, r/o B-220, Raghubir Nagar, Tagore Garden, West, New Delhi-110027 do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

1. That I am the respondent no.2 in the above noted case therefore I am well conversant with the facts of the case and competent to swear the present affidavit.

2. That I have settled all the disputes with my free will and choice with all the petitioners.

3. That I have received all the considerations as settled between the deponent and petitioner no.1 and the quashing the FIR No.28/2014, u/s 498A/406/34 IPC, P.S. Khyala and consequential proceedings thereto. On account of permanent alimony, value for all the remaining istridhan articles etc. etc., I undertakes that I shall not raise any claim whatsoever in future against the petitioners for any reason whatsoever regarding this marriage etc.

4. That my marriage with the petitioner no.1 has been dissolved by the decree of mutual divorce granted by Sh. Yashwant Singh, Ld. Pincipal Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi. The copy of the decree sheet is already annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2. Now I do not want to proceed any proceeding against all the petitioners as all of my disputes have already been settled.

5. That the contents of accompanying petition have been explained to me by my counsel in

vernacular and the same are true and best of my knowledge.

DEPONENT VERIFICATION

Verified at Delhi on this 18th day of March, 2016 that the contents of the affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

DEPONENT"

4. In pursuance to the aforesaid settlement, the entire sum of

Rs.4,10,000/- has already been received by the respondent

No.2/complainant.

5. Mamta, respondent No.2/complainant, who is present in Court and has

been duly identified by IO ASI Surender Singh, Police Station- Khyala,

Delhi states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, she

is no longer keen to proceed with the subject FIR and the proceedings arising

therefrom.

6. In view of the foregoing, since the dispute which resulted in the

registration of the subject FIR has already been resolved amicably by the

parties without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, no useful purpose

will be served by proceeding with the subject FIR and the proceedings

arising therefrom.

7. Consequently, FIR No.28/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC,

registered at Police Station- Khyala, Delhi and the proceedings arising

therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners subject to

their depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) in

aggregate with the Victims' Compensation Fund, Government of NCT of

Delhi within a period of two weeks from today. The receipt of the said

deposit shall be furnished to the concerned IO.

8. The writ petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MARCH 30, 2016 dn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter