Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 532 Del
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2016
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 9848/2015 & CMs No.23747-48/2015
RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Indra Sen Singh, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
% 22.01.2016
1. Counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner had
submitted a representation to his Commandant, in terms of the order
dated 16.10.2015, which was directed to be decided expeditiously.
Pursuant thereto, the respondents have decided the said
representation by passing an order dated 28.10.2015, a copy whereof
has been handed over and taken on record. She states that in terms of
the said order, the petitioner has been duly accommodated in Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the aforesaid position
and states that in view of the order dated 28.10.2015, nothing further
survives for adjudication in the present petition.
3. While taking on record the order dated 28.10.2015, the present
petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J
SUNIL GAUR, J JANUARY 22, 2016 sk/ap
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!