Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tipu Sultan Saifi & Ors. vs State & Anr
2016 Latest Caselaw 1197 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1197 Del
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2016

Delhi High Court
Tipu Sultan Saifi & Ors. vs State & Anr on 16 February, 2016
Author: Siddharth Mridul
#24
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                          Date of decision: 16th February, 2016

+        W.P.(CRL) 507/2016

         TIPU SULTAN SAIFI & ORS.              ..... Petitioners
                       Through    Mr. M.S. Khan, Mr. Alim Miraj and
                                  Mr. T. Ali Khan, Advocates along
                                  with petitioners
                       versus

         STATE & ANR                                         ..... Respondents

Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC (Crl.) with Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate SI Shabbir Ali, P.S. Sangam Vihar Resp. no.2/complainant in-person CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking

quashing of FIR No. 399/2014 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at

Police Station- Sangam Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner no. 1 (husband) and

respondent No.2/complainant (wife) were married to each other according to

Muslim rites and customs on 15th November, 2011. Owing to temperamental

and ideological differences between the parties to the marriage, they started

living separately since 2012. One child namely Master Ashad has been born

out of the said wedlock and is presently in the custody of respondent

no.2/complainant (wife). On a complaint instituted by respondent no.2

(wife), the subject FIR was registered against the petitioner no. 1 (husband)

and his family members.

3. Counsel for the parties state that with the aid and assistance of

Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi, the outstanding matrimonial

dispute between the parties to the union has been settled amicably by way of

a Settlement Agreement dated 26th August, 2015. The salient terms and

conditions of the settlement as enshrined in the said Settlement Agreement

are as follows:-

"1. The second party Tipu Sultan Saifi has pronounced 'Talak' to the first party Smt. Yasmeen as per Muslim law and rites which has been accepted by the first party.

2. It is agreed between the parties that they have fully and finally settled all their claims towards istridhan, Mehar and maintenance- past, present and future, as well as towards any other articles and/or issue and/or disputes concerning the wedlock of the parties and also for the above-named minor son of the parties, for a total sum of Rs. 3,75,000/- (Rupees Three Lac Seventy Five Thousand only).

3. It is also agreed between the parties that the settled amount of Rs. 3,75,000/- will be paid by the second party

to the first party in total six (6) installments by way of cash/DD at different stages, in the following manner:

(a) First installment of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) will be paid on 11.9.2015 before the court of Ms. Poonam A. Bamba, learned Judge, Family Court, Saket at the time of making statement by the first party for withdrawal of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the execution petition.

(b) Second installment of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) will be paid before the learned referral court of Ms. Ankita Lal, learned MM, Saket Court, at the time of making statement by the first party for withdrawal of the present petition under DV Act on 8.10.2015.

(c) Thereafter, one installmentof Rs. (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) and two installments of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees seventy five thousand only) each will be paid on 10.11.2015; 10.12.2015 and on 10.1.2016 at the house of the first party against acknowledgment.

4. It is also agreed between the parties that the last installment of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees seventy five thousand only) will be paid by the second party to the first party at the time of making statements by the parties before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for quashing of the proceedings arising out of case FIR No. 399/2014, PS Sangam Vihar, under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and that the petition for quashing of the said FIR will be filed by the second party by or before 10.2.2016.

5. It is also agreed between the parties that the expenses for drafting and filing the petition for quashing of the FIR will be borne exclusively by the second party, however, the first party shall cooperate at all stages to

the second party, including that of drafting and signing of the quashing petition and making statements before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.

6. It is also agreed that henceforth, the above named minor son of the parties shall remain in the care and custody of his mother (the first party herein) and that the second party shall have no visitation rights over the said minor son and that he will also not claim the custody of the minor son in future in any circumstance. It is also agreed that henceforth, the education expenses and all other day to day expenses of the minor child will be borne by the first party for which nothing will be claimed from the second party.

7. It is also agreed between the parties that henceforth, they will not file any claim against each other or their family members with regard to their marriage solemnized on 15.11.2011."

4. In a nutshell, it has been agreed by and between the parties to the

union that respondent no. 2 (wife) shall be paid a sum of Rs. 3.75 lakhs

towards all her claims against the petitioners.

5. Counsel for the parties further state that pursuant to the said settlement

between the parties to the union, a sum of Rs. 2.25 lakhs has already been

received by respondent no.2 (wife). The balance sum of Rs. 1.50 lakhs has

been paid to respondent no. 2 (wife) today. The latter acknowledges receipt

thereof.

6. Counsel for the parties also state that a Talaqnama in accordance with

Muslim Personal Law has already been executed between the parties which

has been formalized under the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 26 th

August, 2015.

7. Ms. Yasmeen, the respondent No.2/complainant (wife), who is present

in Court and has been identified by the Investigating Officer i.e. SI Shabbir

Ali, Police Station- Sangam Vihar, Delhi, states that in pursuance to the

settlement arrived at between the parties to the union, she is no longer keen

to proceed with the subject FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

8. Since the dispute between the parties which arose out of a matrimonial

discord between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 and resulted in the

registration of the subject FIR, has been settled amicably by way of a

Settlement Agreement dated 26th August, 2015, without any undue influence,

pressure or coercion; as the parties have obtained Talaqnama; and the

settlement between the parties is lawful, no useful purpose will be served by

proceeding with the subject FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom.

9. Resultantly, the FIR No. 399/2014 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC

registered at Police Station- Sangam Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings

arising therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners

subject to each one of them paying a sum of Rs. 5,000/- each (Rs. 35,000/- in

aggregate) to Ms. Yasmeen, the respondent no. 2/ complainant (wife) within

a period of eight weeks from today to enure to the benefit of her minor son-

Ashad. A copy of the receipt thereof shall be provided to the Investigating

Officer in the subject FIR.

10. The respondent no. 2/complainant (wife) undertakes to deposit the

aforesaid amount of Rs. 35,000/- in a joint bank account to be opened in the

name of the complainant and her minor son- Ashad and operated by the

complainant as guardian of the minor. The undertaking given by the

respondent no. 2 is hereby accepted.

11. With the above directions, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of

accordingly.

12. Copy of this order be given dasti under signature of the Court Master.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J FEBRUARY 16, 2016 sd

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter