Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Fil India Business Services ... vs ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 7177 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 7177 Del
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2015

Delhi High Court
Fil India Business Services ... vs ... on 21 September, 2015
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 221/2015

                                    Reserved on 10th September, 2015
                         Date of pronouncement: 21st September, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

FIL India Business Services Private Limited
                                          Petitioner/Transferor Company
      WITH

FIL Research (India) Private Limited
                                          Petitioner/Transferee Company

                               Through Mr. Mahesh Aggarwal and
                               Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Advocates for the
                               petitioners
                               Ms.     Aparna     Mudiam, Assistant
                               Registrar of Companies for the
                               Regional Director
                               Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
                               Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of

the Scheme of Amalgamation of FIL India Business Services Private

Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with FIL

Research (India) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee

company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The transferor company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on 27th March, 2009 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of

Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 7th November, 2007 with the Registrar of

Companies, Maharashtra at Mumbai under the name and style of Fidelity

Funds Network Private Limited. The company changed its name to FIL

Funds Network Private Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of

incorporation on 11th June, 2008. The company again changed its name

to FIL Research (India) Private Limited and obtained the fresh certificate

of incorporation on 23rd May, 2012. Thereafter, the company shifted its

registered office from the State of Maharashtra to Delhi and obtained a

certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi &

Haryana at New Delhi on 17th December, 2014.

5. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company is

Rs.50,00,000/- divided into 5,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The

present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.1,47,130/- divided into 14,713 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully

paid-up.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.2,99,00,00,000/- divided into 29,90,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company

is Rs.2,43,85,39,370/- divided into 24,38,53,937 equity shares of Rs.10/-

each fully paid-up.

7. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the

joint application, being CA(M) 39/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.

The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor

and transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also

been filed.

8. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by

the petitioners that the amalgamation will result in reduction of

overheads, administrative and other expenditure and bring about

operational rationalization, organizational efficiency and optimal

utilization of various resources. It is further claimed that proposed

amalgamation will provide an opportunity to leverage combined assets

and capital better, build a stronger sustainable business, improve the

potential for further growth and expansion of the businesses of the two

companies.

9. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that since the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary

of the transferee company, the transferee company shall not issue any

share or pay any consideration to the transferor company or to its

shareholders pursuant to the sanction of this Scheme.

10. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 and/or under Sections

210, 212(1) to (7) & (11) to (17), 214, 215, 216(1) & (3), 217, 219, 220,

223, 224(1), (3) & (4), and 225 of the Companies Act, 2013 are pending

against the petitioner companies.

11. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies

in their separate meetings held on 9th March, 2015 have unanimously

approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the

Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the

transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.

12. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 39/2015

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 16th April, 2015, this court

allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening

and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the transferor and

transferee companies, there being no secured or unsecured creditors of

the petitioner companies, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or

without modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

13. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 7th

May, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and

(Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioner

showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the

Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of

citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 12th June, 2015. Copies of the

newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed along

with the said affidavit.

14. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 24th August, 2015

wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in

the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor company

do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the

interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as per second proviso

of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

15. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 24th August, 2015. Relying on Clause

10.1 of Part-B of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor company

shall become the employees of the transferee company without any

break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in

Clause 7 of Part-B of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee

company shall account for the amalgamation of the transferor company

in its books of accounts with effect from appointed date as per 'Pooling of

Interest method' as defined in the Accounting Standard-14 'Accounting

for Amalgamation' issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of

India. He further submitted that in Clause 16 of Part-B of the Scheme, it

has been stated that upon this scheme becoming effective, the transferor

company shall stand dissolved without the process of winding up.

16. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavits dated

24th August, 2015 of Mr. Ameet Nayak, authorized representative of the

transferor company and of Mr. Alok Loyalka, authorized representative of

the transferee company, have submitted that neither the petitioner

companies nor their counsel have received any objection pursuant to the

citations published in the newspapers on 12th June, 2015.

17. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of

the petitioner companies, there being no secured or unsecured creditors

of the petitioner companies, to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation

and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the

Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of

sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is

hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and

394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply

with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of

this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is

also clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting

exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with

law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of

Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2015, the transferor company shall stand

dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up.

18. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs may

also be imposed keeping in view the fact that the matter has involved

examination of extensive records and prioritized hearings. He submits

that at least costs of Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the same is acceptable to

him. Looking to the circumstances, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- by way of costs in the Common Pool Fund of the Official

Liquidator, within two weeks.

19. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

September 21, 2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter