Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 7912 Del
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2015
#24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 14.10.2015
W.P.(CRL) 2317/2015
MANISH & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Criminal) with Ms. Srilina Roy, Advocate and SI Abhishek Kumar, PS- Prasad Nagar, Delhi for R-1 Respondent No.2/Complainant in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A.15233/2015 (Exemption)
Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
W.P.(CRL) 2317/2015
1. The present is a petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India
read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)
praying for quashing of FIR No.501/2015, under sections 394/34 IPC,
registered at Police Station- Prasad Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings arising
therefrom.
2. Briefly encapsulated the facts are that the complainant, who is a tailor
by profession, alleged that the petitioner forcibly broke into his premises and
removed certain articles. On the basis of the said complaint, the subject FIR
was registered.
3. The complainant, who is present in person and has been identified by
the IO in the subject FIR namely, SI Abhishek Kumar, Police Station- Prasad
Nagar, Delhi states that subsequent to the registration of the subject FIR,
with the intervention of friends and family members, the parties have settled
their disputes which arose out of a business transaction, inasmuch as, the
petitioners have been purchasing stitched clothes from the complainant and
there was a disagreement over the quality of the cloth utilized by the
complainant.
4. Since the dispute between the parties, which arose out of a commercial
transaction and lead to the registration of the subject FIR has been amicably
resolved by and between the parties without any undue influence, pressure or
coercion, no useful purpose shall be served by proceeding with the subject
FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom. This view is supported by the
decision of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and
Another reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303.
5. Resultantly, FIR No.501/2015, under sections 394/34 IPC, registered
at Police Station- Prasad Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings arising therefrom
are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners subject to their
depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with the
Victims Compensation Fund, Government of NCT of Delhi within a period
of two weeks from today. The receipt of the said deposit shall be furnished to
the concerned IO.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
7. Dasti.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
OCTOBER 14, 2015 dn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!