Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 8671 Del
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2015
$~6.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 3188/2012 and I.A. 19913/2012, 19916/2012
MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ORS ..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with
Mr. Shantanu Sahay and Mr. Aasish Somasi,
Advocates
versus
YOGESH RATHOD & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Ms. Malavika Lal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 20.11.2015
I.A. 9779/2013 (by the defendants u/O VII R 10 & 11 CPC)
1. Pleadings are complete.
2. An ex-parte ad interim injunction order was granted in favour of
the plaintiffs on 06.11.2012, whereunder the defendants were
restrained from directly or indirectly reproducing/storing/installing
and/or using pirated/unlicensed software of the plaintiffs.
3. Counsel for the defendants states that pursuant to the aforesaid
order, her clients have already purchased the requisite software and
the defendants undertake not to reproduce/store/install and/or use
pirated/unlicensed software of the plaintiffs in future.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the
plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs are ready and willing to give up the
claim of damages against the defendants.
5. Accordingly, while binding the defendants to the statement
recorded hereinabove, the interim order dated 06.11.2012 is made
absolute and the suit is decreed in terms of the said order, while
leaving the parties to bear their own expenses. Decree sheet be drawn
accordingly.
6. The suit is disposed of alongwith the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J NOVEMBER 20, 2015 rkb/ap
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!