Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dalip Kumar vs Registrar General, National ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 1963 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1963 Del
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2015

Delhi High Court
Dalip Kumar vs Registrar General, National ... on 5 March, 2015
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                         W.P.(C) No. 7023/2014
%                                                     5th March, 2015

DALIP KUMAR                                                  ..... Petitioner

                          Through:       Petitioner in person.

                          versus

REGISTRAR GENERAL, NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
                              ..... Respondent

                          Through:       Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.           By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, petitioner, who was appointed on probation for a period of two

years vide letter dated 4.10.2013, with the respondent-National Green

Tribunal, seeks the relief that the respondent should accept the resignation

given by the petitioner vide his letter dated 12.9.2014. This resignation

letter reads as under:-


             "To,
             The Hon'ble Chairperson,
             National Green Tribunal,
             Principal Bench, New Delhi
WP(C) 7023/2014                                                                 Page 1 of 4
              Sub:- My resignation on personal grounds.

            Sir,
            Due to some of my personal domestic reasons I am not able to
      continue my service in the National Green Tribunal anymore. Thus, I
      hereby tender my resignation from the post of Personal Assistant with
      immediate effect (12/9/2014).
            The relevant term/clause of my appointment letter is reproduced
      as under:-
            "The appointment can be terminated at any time by a month's
      notice given by either side viz. the appointee or the appointment
      authority without assigning any reason".

      It is, therefore, requested to relieve me at the earliest from my
      duties.

      Thanking you,
                                             Yours faithfully,
                                                   Sd/-
                                             (Dalip Kumar)
                                             Personal Assistant
                                             NGT, CZB Bhopal"


2.           The appointment letter of the petitioner dated 4.10.2013 issued

by the respondent contains the following relevant clauses:-


             "3.   xxxxx


              (i)   The appointment will be made on a temporary basis.
            The appointee will be on probation for a period of two years
            from the date of appointment to this post which may be
            extended by another 2 years at the discretion of any
            Appointing Authority. On completion of the probation
            period including extended period, there will be no automatic
WP(C) 7023/2014                                                            Page 2 of 4
             confirmation without the specific orders of the Appointing
            Authority.

             (ii) The appointment can be terminated at any time by a
            month's notice given by either side viz. the appointee or the
            Appointing Authority without assigning any reason. The
            Appointing Authority, however, reserves the right of the
            expiration of the stipulated period in which case the
            appointee will be entitled to receive payment of a sum
            equivalent to the pay and allowance for the period of notice
            or the unexpired portion thereof."      (underlining added)

3.           The aforesaid position makes it clear that the respondent cannot

force a person to continue to be its employee, more so during the probation

period, and in which period, the appointment of the employee can be

terminated at any time by one month's notice without giving any reason.

Petitioner, who is present in person agrees that one month's pay can be

deducted by the respondent and consequently, the resignation of the

petitioner be now forthwith accepted.


4.           In view of the aforesaid position, which appears on record, the

terms of appointment and the fact that petitioner has already given the

resignation letter, with the further aspect that the petitioner has made a

statement today that respondent can deduct one month's pay, this writ

petition is allowed and the petitioner is held to have resigned from the

respondent-National Green Tribunal and respondent is legally held to have

WP(C) 7023/2014                                                             Page 3 of 4
 accepted the resignation given by the petitioner in terms of his letter dated

12.9.2014, of course with liberty to the respondent to deduct one month's

pay of the petitioner.

5.           Respondent will now give the letter of petitioner's services

coming to an end with the respondent-National Green Tribunal on account

of his resignation within a period of three weeks from today. Parties are left

to bear their own costs.




MARCH 05, 2015                         VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

ib

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter