Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Ganges Concast Industries ... vs ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 1112 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1112 Del
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2015

Delhi High Court
M/S. Ganges Concast Industries ... vs ... on 6 February, 2015
Author: Sudershan Kumar Misra
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
              COMPANY APPLICATION (MAIN) NO. 15/2015

                                       Reserved on 27th January, 2015
                            Date of pronouncement: 6th February, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Application under Sections 391(1) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

M/s. Ganges Concast Industries Limited
                                     Non-applicant/Transferor Company
      WITH

M/s. Salasar Stainless Limited
                                          Applicant/Transferee Company

                                 Through Mr. Rajeev K. Goel, Advocate
                                 for the applicant

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This application has been filed under Sections 391(1) & 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the applicant/transferee company seeking

directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of convening the

meetings of its equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors to

consider and approve, with or without modification, the proposed

Scheme of Amalgamation of M/s. Ganges Concast Industries Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) with M/s. Salasar

Stainless Limited (hereinafter referred to as the applicant/transferee

company).

2. The registered office of the applicant/transferee company is

situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. However, the

registered office of the transferor company is situated at Uttar Pradesh,

outside the jurisdiction of this court.

3. The applicant/transferee company was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 9th April, 2010 with the Registrar of Companies,

NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The present authorized share capital of the applicant/transferee

company is Rs.5,00,00,000/- divided into 50,00,000 equity shares of

Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid up capital of the company

is Rs.4,99,90,000/- divided into 49,99,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

5. Copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

applicant/transferee company has been filed on record. The audited

balance sheet, as on 31st March, 2014, of the applicant/transferee

company, along with the report of the auditors, has also been filed.

6. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the application and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted

by the applicant that the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary

of the transferee company. It is claimed that the proposed amalgamation

would result in business synergy, pooling of resources and consolidation

of these companies. It is further claimed that the proposed amalgamation

will result in usual economies of a centralized and a large company

including elimination of duplicate work, reduction in overheads, better

and more productive utilization of human and other resources and

enhancement of overall business efficiency. It will enable these

companies to combine their managerial and operating strength, to build a

wider capital and financial base and to promote and secure overall

growth of their businesses.

7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that since the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary

of the transferee company, no shares will be issued by the transferee

company pursuant to this Scheme.

8. It has been submitted by the applicant that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

applicant company.

9. The Board of Directors of the applicant/transferee company in their

meetings held on 20th December, 2014 have unanimously approved the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. A copy of the Resolution passed at

the meeting of the Board of Directors of the applicant/transferee

company has been placed on record.

10. The applicant/transferee company has 07 equity shareholders. All

the equity shareholders have given their consents/no objections in writing

to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Their consents/no objections

have been placed on record. They have been examined and found in

order. In view thereof, the requirement of convening the meeting of the

equity shareholders of the applicant/transferee company to consider and,

if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme

of Amalgamation is dispensed with.

11. The applicant/transferee company has certain secured and

unsecured creditors, whose details are not mentioned in the application.

Learned counsel for the applicant however submitted that the transferor

company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company and

since it is an amalgamation of the wholly owned subsidiary company with

its holding company, therefore, rights of secured and unsecured creditors

of the transferee company will not be affected adversely. It is further

submitted that no new shares will be issued on amalgamation and the

transferor and transferee companies are not proposing any arrangement

with their shareholders and creditors, hence, consents/no objections of

secured and unsecured creditors of the applicant/transferee company are

not required to be obtained for the purpose of amalgamation. He,

therefore, prays that the requirement of convening and holding the

meetings of the secured and unsecured creditors of the

applicant/transferee company may kindly be dispensed with.

12. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the applicant

placed reliance on the judgment of this court dated 19th January, 2010, in

the matter of M/s. Prasneeta Engineering Private Limited & Anr.

[CA(M)3/2010] wherein in similar circumstances, this court, has

dispensed with the requirement of convening and holding the meetings of

the secured and unsecured creditors of the transferee company without

obtaining their consents/no objection to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation. A similar view has also been espoused by the court in the

matter of Imperia Homes Private Limited and Anr. [CA(M) 78/2014].

13. In view of the submissions made at the bar and the settled law on

the subject, the requirement of convening and holding the meetings of

the secured and unsecured creditors of the applicant/transferee

company, to consider and if though fit, approve, with or without

modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, is dispensed with.

14. The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Dasti

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

February 06, 2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter