Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2824 Del
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2015
15.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 3003/2012
ASHISH BATRA ..... Plaintiff
Through : Mr. R.D. Sharma, Advocate
versus
AMRIT PAHUJA ..... Defendant
Through : Mr. N.K. Nayyar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 08.04.2015
I.A. No.25009/2014 (by the counsel for the plaintiff for seeking discharge)
1. The present application was listed on 5.2.2015, on which date,
counsel for the plaintiff was unable to inform the Court as to the fate
of the notice sent by him to his client by speed post and had sought
some time.
2. Today, counsel for the plaintiff states after the last date of
hearing, he has issued a fresh notice to his client on 6.2.2015, which
was despatched by speed post, but the said article has been returned
unserved with the remarks "the article has remained undelivered".
3. It is stated by the counsel for the plaintiff that there is no other
address of the plaintiff available with him and despite best efforts
made by him, his client neither contacted him, nor given him any
instruction. An affidavit has been filed by the counsel for the plaintiff
under index dated 19.2.2015, in support of the averments made in the
application.
4. In view of the averments made in the application and the
affidavit, the same is allowed and counsel for the plaintiff is discharged
from the present case.
5. The application is disposed of.
CS(OS) 3003/2012 & IA No.18198/2012
None is present for the plaintiff. It appears that the plaintiff does
not wish to pursue the present suit. The same is accordingly
dismissed in default for non-prosecution, along with the pending
application.
HIMA KOHLI, J APRIL 08, 2015 sk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!