Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sare Marketing Pvt Ltd And Ors vs ...........
2014 Latest Caselaw 4641 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4641 Del
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2014

Delhi High Court
Sare Marketing Pvt Ltd And Ors vs ........... on 19 September, 2014
$~35
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    CO.PET.176/2014
IN THE MATTER
SARE MARKETING PVT LTD AND ORS                 .....Petitioners

                Through: Ms.Aditi Sharma, Advocate for
                         the Petitioners.
                          Mr. Rajneesh Kumar Singh,
                          Assistant Registrar of Companies
                          for the Regional Director.

                          Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the
                          Official Liquidator.

     CORAM:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                ORDER

% 19.09.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This second motion joint petition has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Sare Marketing Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No. 1), Aggressive Traders Private Limited(hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No. 2), Emergent Infotech Private Limited(hereinafter referred to as

=============================================

Transferor Company No. 3), Anchor Agro Private Limited(hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No. 4) and Petals Exim Private Limited(hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No. 5) with Sumant Investments Private Limited(hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Petitioner Companies). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Petition.

2. The registered office of the Petitioner Companies is situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of the Petitioner Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Accounts as at 31st March 2013 of the Petitioner Companies have also been enclosed with the Petition.

5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the Petitioner Companies approving the

=============================================

Scheme of Amalgamation have also been placed on record.

6. It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner Companies.

7. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed C.A (M) No. 29 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings. Vide Order dated18th February 2014, this Court allowed the Application and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors of the Petitioner Companies. There are no Secured Creditors of the Petitioner Companies.

8. The Petitioner Companies have thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide Order dated 14th March 2014, notice in the Petition was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published in the "Business Standard" (English) and "Jansatta" (Hindi). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding

=============================================

service of the Petition on the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspaper. Copies of the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have been filed along with the Affidavit of Service.

9. In response to the notice issued, the Official Liquidator sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his Report dated 8th May 2014,wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or to public interest as per the 2nd proviso of section 394(1) of the Act.

10. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated26th May 2014. Relying on the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that, upon sanction of the

=============================================

Scheme, all the employees of the Transferor Companies shall become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or interruption in their services.

11. The learned Regional Director in its Affidavit has submitted that the Reserve Bank of India was requested vide letter dated 13.05.2014 to re-examine the issue relating to grant of exemption to the Transferee Company from NDSI-NBFC Company.

12. The learned Regional Director further submits that the Company had not complied with Para 18 of NBFC (Non-deposit Accepting or Holding) Companies Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2007.

13. Mr. Ranjeesh Kumar Singh, Assistant ROC, submits that vide letter dated 21.05.2014, the Reserve Bank of India has stated that the Petitioner, namely M/s. Sumant Investments Pvt. Ltd., is eligible for exemption from CIC Status.

14. In view of the letter of the Reserve Bank of India, the above concerns raised by the Regional Director in his Affidavit dated 26.05.2014 do not survive.

=============================================

15. The learned Regional Directorfurther submits that a letter dated 28.04.2014 was received from the Income Tax Authorities requesting for at least one month time form the Court. However, no further communication has been received from the Income Tax Department. He submits that till date no objection has been received from the Income Tax Department.

16. In view of the aforesaid clarifications, the concerns of the Regional Director have been duly addressed.

17. No objection has been received to the Scheme from any other party. Ms. Aditi Sharma, learned counsel for Petitioner Companies, has filed an affidavit dated 15.09.2014 confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor she has received any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.

18. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation/reports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation.

=============================================

Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law.

19. Certified copy of the order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme, the whole or part of the undertaking, the property, rights and powers of the Transferor Companies be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Companies be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed.

20. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if payable in accordance with any law; or permission/ compliance with any other department which may be specifically required under any law.

=============================================

21. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner Companies (collectively) would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from today. The statement is accepted.

22. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 st

=============================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter