Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ar Aerotech Private Limited vs ............
2014 Latest Caselaw 4397 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4397 Del
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2014

Delhi High Court
Ar Aerotech Private Limited vs ............ on 12 September, 2014
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
$~22
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    CO.PET 287/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
AR AEROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED       ..... Petitioners

                  Through:   Mr. Ashish Middha Advocate for
                             the Petitioner.

                             Mr. P.K. Mallik, Deputy Registrar
                             of Companies for the Regional
                             Director.

                             Mr. S.B. Gautam,         the      Official
                             Liquidator.

     CORA M:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                   ORDER

% 12.09.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This second motion joint Petition has been filed under sections 391 & 394 read with section 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, ("Act"), 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of AR Aerotech Private Limited Transferor Company (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) with AR Airways Private Limited, (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (collectively referred to as Petitioner Companies). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Petition.

===============================================

2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.

3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of Petitioner Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Petition.

4. The copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Accounts as at 31 st December, 2013 of the Petitioner Companies have also been enclosed with the Petition.

5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also been placed on record.

6. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Companies submits that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner Companies.

7. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) 48 of 2014 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings. Vide order dated 14.03.2014, this court allowed the application and

===============================================

requirement of convening all the meetings of Shareholders and Creditors of the Transferor Companies and of the Transferee Company were dispensed with.

8. The Petitioner Companies had thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 5th May 2014, notice of the Petition was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator attached with the Court. Citations were also directed to be published in "Business Standard" in English and Hindi. The same were published on 17 th July, 2014 in Jansatta in Hindi and 17 th July, 2014 in English in Business standard as per the orders of the Court. Affidavit of Publication has been filed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspaper. Copies of the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have also been filed.

9. In response to the notice issued, the Official Liquidator sought information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information received, learned Official Liquidator has filed his report dated 24th July, 2014, wherein he has stated that he has not received any

===============================================

complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Company, which is subject matter of dissolution, do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members, creditors or to public interest as per the 2nd proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

10. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated 25 th August, 2014. Relying on the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme, all the employees of the Transferor Company shall become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or interruption in their services. Further the Regional Director submits that despite notice, the Income Tax Authorities have not raised any objection with regard to the scheme.

11. The Learned Regional Director, in his affidavit, has stated that both the Transferor and Transferee companies are governed by Government regulatory that is Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and intimation has sent to DGCA by letter dated

===============================================

10.06.2014 along with the copy of petition and the scheme called for their objection if any. And further it is submitted that no objection has been received from DGCA.

12. In response to the aforesaid observation, the Petitioners has filed an affidavit submitting that the Petitioner Companies have sent letter dated 10.06.2014 to the DGCA which was received by them on 17.06.2014 and till date neither of the Companies has received any letter or communication from DGC A. The petitioners have undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions passed by DGCA and further undertake that the approval of the scheme of amalgamation by this court shall not be construed as an approval of transfer of licenses and permits by DGCA.

13. In view of the aforesaid clarifications and undertaking given by the Petitioners, the concerns of the Regional Director have been duly addressed.

14. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation from any other party. Mr. Atul Kumar Jain, Director of Transferee Company has filed an affidavit confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor their Counsel has received any

===============================================

objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.

15. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and Creditors (secured and Unsecured) of the Petitioner Companies; representation/reports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law.

16. Certified copy of the formal order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, all the property, rights and powers of the Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into

===============================================

effect, the Transferor Company shall stand dissolved without winding up.

17. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty or any other charges, if pa yable, in accordance with any law; or permission/compliance with any other requirement which may be specifically required under any law.

18. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner Companies submits that the Petitioner Companies (collectively) would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from today. The said statement is accepted.

19. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 sv

===============================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter