Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Resident Welfare Associatioin ... vs South Delhi Municipal ...
2014 Latest Caselaw 4257 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4257 Del
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2014

Delhi High Court
Resident Welfare Associatioin ... vs South Delhi Municipal ... on 8 September, 2014
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*            IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+
          C.M.(M) No.820/2014 and C.M.No.14802/2014 (stay)

%                                                   08th September, 2014

RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATIOIN (RWA)                           ......Petitioner
                 Through: None

                          VERSUS

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ...... Respondents

Through: Ms.Yootika Pallavi, Advocate for R-

1 & 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. On the first call, a passover was requested on behalf of the petitioner.

On the second call, no one appeared for the petitioner.

2. Challenge by means of this petition under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India is to the impugned order dated 22.3.2014 which has

allowed an application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by a contra resident welfare association.

3. The disputes in the suit pertain to the rights to use and access the

community hall in Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, and with respect to which there

are contesting associations of different residents of the area, and therefore by

the impugned order the applicant/association has been allowed to be

impleaded as a party.

4. I may note that the respondent no.1 herein, and which was the

defendant no.1 in the suit, did not oppose the application. It is the

respondent no.1/defendant no.1 which had provided the community hall.

Since the issue is with respect to a right to possess the community hall for

and on behalf of the residents, if there are disputes as to the representation of

the residents, I do not see any illegality that a different association of the

residents is allowed to be impleaded as a party in the suit.

5. Dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own costs.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2014 KA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter