Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajgharana Projects Private ... vs ..........
2014 Latest Caselaw 5155 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5155 Del
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2014

Delhi High Court
Rajgharana Projects Private ... vs .......... on 14 October, 2014
$~35
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    Co. Appl. (M) No. 140/2014
IN THE MATTER OF
RAJGHARANA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
                                 ....Applicants

                       Through:     Mr. Amit Goel, Advocate
                                   for    the      Applicant
                                   Companies.

     CORAM:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                ORDER

% 14.10.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation ("Scheme") of Rajgharana Projects Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) with Umra Securities Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Applicant Companies). A copy of the proposed Scheme has been enclosed along with the Application.

================================================

2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details with regard to the date of incorporation of Applicant Companies, their Authorized, Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Capital have been set out in the present Application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 st March, 2014 of the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the present Application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceeding under sections 235 to 251 of the Act is pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.

6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of all the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the present Application.

================================================

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company is apparent from the chart given below:-

Company      No. of    Consent      No. of       Consent         No. of          Consent
             Share     Given        Secured      Given           Unsecured       Given
             holders                Creditors                    Creditors
Transferor      3        All           Nil           N.A             Nil          N.A
Company
Transferee      7        All            1              All              4          All
Company



8. In view of the above, a prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.

9. In view of the written consents/NOC obtained by the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies, the requirements of convening meetings of the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies are dispensed with.

10. In respect of the written consent/NOC given by the sole Corporate Secured Creditor of the Transferee Company, namely Housing Development Finance

================================================

Corporation Limited, Munirka, New Delhi, the Board Resolution has not been enclosed with the "No Objection Certificate". The Transferee Company is directed to issue a specific notice to the said Corporate Secured Creditor at the time of moving of the Second Motion calling for their objection, if any, to the Scheme.

11. In view of the written consents/NOC obtained by the all Un-secured Creditors of the Transferee Company, the requirements of convening meetings of Un-secured Creditors the of the Transferee Company are dispensed with.

12. Since there are no Secured Creditors in Transferor Company, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Secured Creditors of the Transferor Company does not arise.

13. Since there are no Un-secured Creditors in Transferor Company, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Un-secured Creditors of the Transferor Company does not arise.

================================================

14. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 14 , 2014 st

================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter