Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gaurav Taneja vs State And Others
2014 Latest Caselaw 5101 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 5101 Del
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2014

Delhi High Court
Gaurav Taneja vs State And Others on 13 October, 2014
$~60
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+      TEST CASE 93/2013

       GAURAV TANEJA                                     ..... Petitioner
                   Through:           Mrs. Biji Rajesh with Mr.Gaurang
                                      Kanth, Advocates

                          versus

       STATE AND OTHERS                               ..... Respondents
                    Through:          Mr. Kumar Ravi Ranjan, Advocate for
                                      R-2 and 3.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL
                    ORDER

% 13.10.2014

1. This petition under Section 274 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925

(the Act) for grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 06.09.2005

purported to have been executed by Late Shri Raj Kishan Taneja and

duly registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar-V, Pitampura, New

Delhi vide Registration No.26481, Book No.1, Volume 3, has been

filed by Petitioner Gaurav Taneja, who is the younger son of the

deceased Shri Raj Kishan Taneja.

2. It is alleged that Late Shri Raj Kishan Taneja died on 04.07.2011 at

the Army Hospital, New Delhi leaving behind the Petitioner and

Respondents no.2 and 3 as his only legal heirs. Petitioner and

Respondent no.2 are the two sons whereas Respondent no.3 Smt. Asha

Rani Taneja is the widow of deceased Raj Kishan Taneja.

3. According to the Petitioner, by virtue of the Will dated 06.09.2005,

the deceased bequeathed his immovable property, i.e. Property no.108,

Block G, Pocket P, known as GP 108, Maurya Enclave, Pitampura,

Delhi-110088, in favour of the Petitioner, who is the younger son of

the deceased.

4. Notice of the petition was issued to the Respondents and citations to

the General Public as also to the legal heirs were also published in

"The Statesman" (English), Delhi Edition and "Punjab Kesari"

(Hindi), Delhi Edition.

5. The near relations, Respondents no.2 and 3 filed their Affidavit-cum-

no objection certificates for grant of probate in respect of Will dated

06.09.2005 of Late Shir Raj Kishan Taneja in favour of the Petitioner.

6. In support of the petition, the Petitioner has filed his own Affidavit

Ex.PW-1/X. He entered the witness box as PW-1. He testified that he

is the younger son of Late Shri Raj Kishan Taneja. Respondent no.2 is

his elder son whereas Respondent no.3 is his widow. He testified that

his father Late Shri Raj Kishan Taneja died on 04.07.2011 at Army

Hospital. He proved the death certificate as Ex.PW-1/1. He deposed

that his father was the absolute owner of the property bequeathed and

proved copy of the Conveyance Deed as Ex.PW-1/2. He added that

his father executed a Will dated 06.09.2005 bequeathing the earlier

stated property in his favour.

7. The Petitioner also examined Dhiraj Kuamr Basra, one of the attesting

witness to the Will as PW-2. PW-2 Dhiraj Kumar Basra proved his

Affidavit Ex.PW-2/X and deposed that Late Shri Raj Kishan Taneja

had executed a Will Ex.PW-2/1 and had signed the same in his

presence and in presence of Ms. Savita Dahiya, the other attesting

witness to the Will.

8. Valuation report in respect of the property, subject matter of the Will

has been received. The valuation given is `1,48,12,560/- which has

been accepted by the Petitioner.

9. I have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and have perused

the record.

10. The Will dated 06.09.2005 Ex.PW-2/1 has been proved by PW-2 by

identifying the signatures of the Testator and other attesting witness

Ms. Savita Dahiya.

11. It is proved that Will Ex.PW-2/1 was executed by Late Shri Raj

Kishan Taneja without any coercion, force, pressure or undue

influence and in sound disposing state of mind. All the more, there is

no contest to the Petition as all the other Class-I heirs of Late Shri Raj

Kishan Taneja have submitted their no objection to the grant of

probate in favour of the Petitioner.

12. I do not find any impediment in grant of probate in favour of the

Petitioner.

13. The Petition is accordingly allowed.

14. I hereby grant probate of the Will dated 06.09.2005 of Late Shri Raj

Kishan Taneja in respect of the property as mentioned in the Will

Ex.PW-2/1 in favour of the Petitioner on filing of necessary court fee

and furnishing an administrative and surety bond.

15. Pending application also stands disposed of.

G.P. MITTAL, J.

OCTOBER 13, 2014 vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter