Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 2470 Del
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2014
$-R7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DECIDED ON : 15th MAY, 2014
+ CRL.A.No. 201/2011
RAVINDER CHAUHAN ..... Appellant
Through : Mr.Pankaj Tripathi, Advocate
along with appellant in person.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent
Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.Garg, J. (Open Court)
1. The appellant was convicted by a judgment dated 09.12.2010
of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 51/10 arising
out of FIR No. 52/10 PS M.S.Park for committing offences under Sections
367/377 IPC. By an order dated 10.12.2010, the appellant was awarded RI
for three years with fine ` 3,000/- under Section 367 IPC and RI for five
years with fine ` 4,000/- under Section 377 IPC. Both the sentences were
to operate concurrently.
2. Appellant's counsel on instructions has stated that the
appellant has opted not to pursue the appeal as he has come out of the jail
after completing the sentence awarded. To this, learned Addl. Public
Prosecutor has no objection.
3. Since the appellant has served the sentence awarded to him
and has given up challenge to the findings of the Trial Court and opted not
to pursue the appeal on merits, the appeal is dismissed as 'not pressed'.
Trial Court record be sent back forthwith with the copy of the order. The
Trial Court shall confirm from the jail authorities if the sentence awarded
to the appellant has been served by him in compliance of the sentence
order; whether the fine imposed has been paid or the appellant has served
default sentence. The Trial Court shall also ensure if the fine amount (if
any) recovered from the appellant has been given as token of
compensation to the victim.
(S.P.GARG) JUDGE
MAY 15, 2014 / tr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!