Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1698 Del
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ TR.P(C) No.26/2014
% 28th March, 2014
MRS. MONICA MALIK ......Petitioner
Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate.
VERSUS
MR. AMIT MALIK ...... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. There is no merit in the petition under Section 24 of Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for various reasons inasmuch as neither
pleadings of the cases which are proposed to be transferred have been filed,
and nor the common questions of law and fact in the two cases have been
stated. More importantly, the basic ground seeking transfer under Section 24
of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is only the convenience of a party
i.e petitioner herein.
2. Merely because now there are more than one district courts in
Delhi, and that one of the district courts is nearer than other district court,
the same is not a ground for invoking or exercising powers under Section 24
CPC. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then, consolidation of cases
will prejudice trial of the earlier case which is at an advanced stage.
3. Dismissed.
MARCH 28, 2014 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J Ne
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!