Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 119 Del
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2014
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 25121 of 2012
In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India.
----------
Sarthak Beura ......... Petitioner
-versus-
Secretary, Board of Secondary Education,
Odisha and others ......... Opposite Parties
For petitioner : M/s.Biraja Pr. Das, A.Ekka,
J.S.Maharana
For opp. parties : M/s. P.K.Mohanty, D.N.Mohapatra,
Smt.J.Mohanty, P.K.Nayak and
S.N.Dash (for O.P. 1)
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI
Date of hearing: 11.12.2013 | Date of judgment : 07.01.2014
Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J. Assailing the letter dated 22.11.2011 issued by the
Deputy Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Odisha (CZ),
Cuttack under Annexure-4 refusing to change the parent's name of
the petitioner in the original High School Certificate, the present writ
petition has been filed.
2. The petitioner's case in nutshell is that he is the
natural born son of Ranjan Kumar Beura and Menaka Beura. During
2
admission of the petitioner in the primary school, his parents name
were inadvertently recorded as Babaji Charan Beura and Kanakalata
Beura and the said mistake was recorded at the time of admission in
the High School. When the petitioner was ready to appear at the
Annual High School Certificate Examination, 2011, the wrong entry of
the parentage of the petitioner was detected by the original parents.
The original parents of the petitioner at that point of time requested
the Headmaster of the School, opposite party no.3 to correct the
mistake. Since the school authorities did not take any steps, the
petitioner had to appear at the Annual High School Certificate
Examination, 2011 with Roll No. 23RE040 from Chaulia Bamara High
School and he passed the said examination in 1st division. On the
basis of the repeated request made by the natural parents, the
Headmaster of the School, opposite party no.3 wrote a letter to
opposite party no.2 with a request to correct the parent's name of the
petitioner. In response to the same, the Deputy Secretary of the
Board of Secondary Education vide letter no. 4862 dated 22.7.2011
intimated the Headmaster of the School to submit necessary
documents for correction of the certificates. In response to the same,
the Headmaster of the School furnished all the necessary documents
desired by opposite party no.2 on 28.7.2011 for making necessary
correction of the certificate, but without considering the same, the
opposite party no.2 by the impugned letter dated 22.11.2011 refused
3
to make any change in respect of the natural parents in the certificate
without assigning any reasons, rather it has only been stated that the
original pass certificate granted by the authorities is in conformity
with the admission register and as there is no clerical error or printing
mistake at Board's level, change of parents name at this stage is not
possible as per Rule. Finding no other way out, the petitioner
represented through his natural father filed Civil Suit No. 19 of 2012
before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kendrapara, and the
court below by judgment dated 25.7.2012 under Annexure-5 decreed
the suit by declaring that the petitioner is the natural born son of
Ranjan Kumar Beura and Menaka Beura. Relying upon the said civil
court decree, the petitioner has approached this Court for change of
his parent's name in the Original H.S.C. Certificate granted by the
Board of Secondary Education.
3. Mr.Biraja Pr. Das, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that when there is civil court decree regarding
the parentage of the petitioner, there is no impediment on the part of
the Board of Secondary Education not to enter the natural parent's
name in the H.S.C. Certificate. In support of his submission, he has
referred to the order dated 25.1.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)
No. 10215 of 2010 (Rasmibarsa Panda v. Secretary, Board of
Secondary Education, Orissa, Cuttack), wherein this Court in a similar
circumstance relying upon the civil court decree directed the Board of
4
Secondary Education to issue corrected provisional certificate-cum-
Memorandum of marks to the petitioner in the said case by
mentioning the names of her natural parents.
4. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, Board of
Secondary Education appeared and filed counter affidavit stating that
no illegalities or irregularities have been committed by the Board
authorities in refusing to carry out the corrections by incorporating
the names of the natural parents of the petitioner, rather, the Board
authorities have acted in conformity with the provisions of law.
Inasmuch as there is no clerical error or printing mistake and as such
there is no scope to make any correction at Board level since the
parent's name furnished by the school authorities has been reflected
in the Annual High School Certificate Examination, 2011. So far as the
reliance placed on the decree of the civil court is concerned, the same
was never made available before the Board authorities to consider the
same, rather, the same has been done after the impugned order in
Annexure-4 was passed. Reference has also been made to Section
(vi) of Regulations 39 and 40 in order to justify the action of the
Board authorities.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and
perusing the records and the judgment dated 25.11.2011 passed by
learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kendrapara in Civil Suit No.19 of
2012, it is clear that against the said judgment, no appeal has been
5
preferred by any of the parties, thereby the judgment so passed by
the learned Civil Judge has reached finality with regard to the
declaration of parentage of the petitioner. Such finding has been
arrived at after trying the suit and the judgment and decree have
been passed by the competent civil court. The Civil Court which
decided the status of the petitioner have got the competence to do
so. Thus, the said judgment amounts to a judgment in rem and binds
all parties since no appeal has been preferred to set aside such
declaration made by the civil court in any higher forum. Therefore,
there is no impediment on the part of the Board of Secondary
Education to make necessary correction in respect of the parents of
the petitioner in the Annual High School Certificate.
6. Applying the principles laid down by this Court in
Rasmibarsa Panda (supra) as well as considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, this Court directs the Board of Secondary
Education to issue corrected Annual High School certificate
mentioning the names of the parents of the petitioner as Ranjan
Kumar Beura and Menaka Beura in terms of the declaration made by
the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kendrapara in Civil Suit No.
19 of 2012. The petitioner is directed to produce a certified copy of
this judgment along with the judgment and decree passed by the
learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kendrapara in Civil Suit No. 19
of 2012 within a period of one week before the Board authorities. The
6
entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
7. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. No cost.
.......................................
Dr.B.R.Sarangi, J.
Orissa High Court, Cuttack The 7th January, 2014/PKSahoo
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!