Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Usha Rani Gautam & Others vs Devender Gautam
2014 Latest Caselaw 849 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 849 Del
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2014

Delhi High Court
Usha Rani Gautam & Others vs Devender Gautam on 13 February, 2014
Author: G. S. Sistani
$~28
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      CS(OS) 720/2010
%                                       Date of Decision: February 13, 2014
       USHA RANI GAUTAM & OTHERS              ..... Plaintiff
               Through: Mr.Prakash Gautam, Advocate

                    versus
       DEVENDER GAUTAM                        ..... Defendant
               Through: Mr.N.Sharma, Advocate

       CORAM:
                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI

G.S. SISTANI, J. (ORAL)

1. The plaintiffs, who are sisters, have filed the present suit against their brother (defendant herein) for partition of the suit property bearing No.J & K- 66 measuring 100 sq. yds situated at Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110 092. As per the plaint, the suit property was purchased by the mother of the parties by virtue of registered sale deed no.4830 registered in Book No.1, volume 201, pages 45-47 on 13.7.1970. The property was built by the father of the parties. The mother of the parties died intestate on 17.2.1995. The parties thereafter relinquished their respective shares in favour of their father by means of a registered relinquishment deed. The father during his lifetime had executed a registered sale deed 19.12.2008 by which he bequeathed all his movable and immovable properties in favour of the plaintiffs. A gift deed was also executed by the father of the parties in favour of the plaintiffs on 2.9.2009.

2. During the pendency of the suit on 10.10.2012 a statement was made by counsel for the plaintiffs that the suit property be divided amongst all the CS(OS) 720/2010 1/2 legal heirs of the deceased and accordingly a preliminary decree for partition was passed on the very same day and a Local Commissioner was also appointed.

3. In the meanwhile the defendant had filed an appeal [RFA(OS)No.109/2012] before the Division Bench which was dismissed. Thereafter a Special Leave Petition No.1/2013 was filed, which was also dismissed.

4. The matter has been adjourned from time to time, to enable the parties to take a decision as to how the property is to be divided. On the last date of hearing the matter was adjourned with a direction to all the parties to remain present in Court.

5. Parties are present in court and submit that they have been able to get an estimated value of the suit property. Parties submit that they would jointly make an endeavour to sell the suit property within 3 months from today and in case they are unable to find a suitable buyer or reach on a consensus, they would execute the decree which may be passed today.

6. In view of the stand taken by the parties, a final decree is passed, defining the shares of all the parties as 1/4th each in the suit property. Decree-sheet be drawn up accordingly.

7. Parties would be entitled to sell the property to the person who gives the highest offer and in case they are unable to find a buyer, any of the party may take steps to execute the decree passed today.

8. In view of above, the present suit stands decreed.

9. No costs.

                                                                   G.S.SISTANI, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2014
Ssn

CS(OS) 720/2010                                                                 2/2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter