Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Quadria Capital Investment ... vs ...............
2014 Latest Caselaw 6348 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 6348 Del
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2014

Delhi High Court
Quadria Capital Investment ... vs ............... on 1 December, 2014
Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva
$~14
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    Co. Appl. (M) No. 131/2014
     IN THE MATTER OF
QUADRIA CAPITAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS
PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.         ....Applicants

          Through: Mr. Faisal Shervani, Mr. Abhinay
                   Sharma and Mr. Ekansh Mishra,
                   Advocates for the Applicant Company.

     CORAM:
     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                ORDER

% 01.12.2014

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)

1. This is first motion joint Application under section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("Act") in connection with the Composite Scheme of Arrangement ("Scheme") between Quadria Capital Investment Advisors Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Demerged Company/Transferor Company) and Quadria Advisors Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Resulting Company) (hereinafter collectively referred to as Applicant Companies) and IBOF Investment Management Private

====================================================

Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme is enclosed with the Application.

2. The registered offices of the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. The registered office of the Transferee Company is situated in Mumbai, outside the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that the Transferee Company is taking appropriate steps under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

4. The details of the dates of incorporation of the Applicant Companies, its authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been enclosed with the Application.

5. The certified copy of the Memorandum and Articles of Association, latest Audited Accounts as on 30.06.2014

====================================================

of the Applicant Companies have been enclosed with the Application.

6. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Act are pending against the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.

7. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.

8. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies and the consents obtained by them for the proposed Scheme are as follows:

Company     No. of   Consent    No of     Consent     No of     Consent
            Share     Given    Secured     Given    Unsecured    Given
            holder             Creditor              Creditor

Company                                                         (98.5% in
                                                                  value)
Resulting     2        All        Nil      N.A         Nil         N.A
Company




====================================================

9. A prayer has been made for dispensation from the requirement of convening the meetings of the Shareholders, Secured and the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.

10. In view of the written consents/NOC given by all the Shareholders of the Applicant Companies, the requirement of convening meeting of Shareholders of the Applicant Companies is dispensed with.

11. In view of the written consents/NOC given by the sole Secured Creditor of the Demerged Company, the requirement of convening meeting of the sole Secured Creditor of the Demerged Company is dispensed with.

12. Since there are no Secured Creditors in the Resulting Company, therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Secured Creditors of the Resulting Company does not arise.

13. In view of the written consents/NOC given by 2 out of 25 of the Unsecured Creditors of the Demerged Company (constituting 98.5% in value), the

====================================================

requirement of convening the meeting of the Unsecured Creditor of the Demerged Company is dispensed with.

14. Since there are no Unsecured Creditors in the Resulting Company therefore the requirement of convening meeting of Unsecured Creditors of the Resulting Company does not arise.

15. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J DECEMBER 01, 2014 st

====================================================

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter