Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subhash Chand And Anr. vs The Financial Commissioner And ...
2014 Latest Caselaw 3855 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 3855 Del
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2014

Delhi High Court
Subhash Chand And Anr. vs The Financial Commissioner And ... on 21 August, 2014
Author: Suresh Kait
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                Judgment delivered on: 21st August, 2014

+                        W.P.(C) 1579/2013

SUBHASH CHAND AND ANR.                                 ..... Petitioners
            Represented by:           Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate.

                         Versus

THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS.            ..... Respondents
              Represented by: Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Mr. Nishant
                              Gautam Gupta and Mr.Anshul
                              Khatri, Advocates for Respondent
                              Nos. 1 to 4.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

W.P.(C) 1579/2013

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking directions to supply the certified copy of the order dated 27.09.1990 along with complete proceedings and pleadings of case No.883/SDM/RA/KWC enabling them to comply with the directions dated 11.12.2012 passed by the respondent No. 1 in case No.402/2012, regarding Khasra No.101 (4-

16) vested in Gaon Sabha Ibrahimpur, Delhi, which was fixed for 28.03.2013.

2. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has undertaken that whatever the record regarding

proceedings as noted above will be available with the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, the same shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cost has been paid. Hence, the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is taken on record.

4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the instant petition is allowed.

5. The date already fixed before the Registrar, i.e., 25.08.2014 stands cancelled.

CM No.8512/2014 With the disposal of the petition itself, the instant application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed.

SURESH KAIT (JUDGE) AUGUST 21, 2014 sb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter