Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 2056 Del
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2014
$-6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DECIDED ON : 24th APRIL, 2014
+ CRL.A. 1168/2012 & CRL.M.A.No. 17574/2012
SMT. VIMLESH ..... Appellant
Through : Appellant is present in person.
versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr.M.S.Vinaik, Advocate with
Ms.Surabhi Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.Garg, J. (Open Court)
1. Smt. Vimlesh (the appellant) has presented the appeal to
challenge the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 16.08.2012 of
learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Special Electricity Court, Saket Courts,
New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 122/09 PS Amar Colony, New Delhi,
whereby she was convicted under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. By
an order dated 04.09.2012, she was sentenced to undergo RI for one and a
half years. ` 7,89,306/- was imposed as fine. The civil liability was
determined ` 5,26,204/-.
2. The matter was referred for settlement to Lok Adalat.
However, the dispute could not be resolved there. Admittedly, the
appellant has deposited ` 75,000/- in compliance of the order dated
05.10.2012 with the respondent / BSES Rajdhani Power Limited. Counsel
for the respondents has stated that ` 3.19 lacs were deposited towards
civil liability by the appellant in the Trial Court. The appellant who is a
widow; has lost her husband on 07.02.2011; dependent upon widow
pension has prayed to take compassionate view to reduce the fine / civil
liability amount. On instructions from the respondents, Mr. M.S.Vinaik,
Advocate has stated that considering the peculiar circumstances of the
case and economic condition of the appellant, the respondent / BSES
Rajdhani Power Limited has no objection if the matter is disposed of as
settled / compounded. Amount of ` 3.19 lacs deposited by the appellant
before the Trial Court be released to the respondent / BSES Rajdhani
Power Limited. The appellant need not to deposit any further amount. To
this, the appellant who is present in person has no objection.
3. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the
respondents, the appeal is accepted in terms of the settlement. Since the
offence stands compounded, the appellant is acquitted of the charge. The
amount of ` 75,000/- deposited by the appellant in compliance of the
order dated 05.10.2012 will be retained by the respondent / BSES
Rajdhani Power Limited. The amount of ` 3.19 lacs deposited by the
appellant before the Trial Court shall be released to the respondent / BSES
Rajdhani Power Limited, as per rules.
4. The appeal stands disposed of. Pending application also
stands disposed of. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith with the
copy of the order.
(S.P.GARG) JUDGE APRIL 24, 2014 / tr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!