Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

New India Assurance Co Ltd. vs Sunita & Ors
2014 Latest Caselaw 1929 Del

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1929 Del
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2014

Delhi High Court
New India Assurance Co Ltd. vs Sunita & Ors on 16 April, 2014
Author: Suresh Kait
$~12
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                      Judgment delivered on: 16th April, 2014

+      MAC.APP. 1101/2011

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD.             ..... Appellant
                 Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv.



                       Versus


SUNITA & ORS                                       ..... Respondents
                            Represented by: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv.


CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1. Vide the present appeal, appellant / Insurance Company has assailed the award dated 16.08.2011, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.11,59,000/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.

2. Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the deceased Ved Prakash died at the age of 41 years. He was working as a labourer and the Ld. Tribunal has assessed his monthly income as Rs.6,000/- as per the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. He further

submits that keeping the age of the deceased into view, Ld. Tribunal ought to have added 30% in this actual income towards future prospects, however added 50%.

3. On the other hand, Mr. S.N. Parashar, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents / claimants, on this issue, does not dispute the arguments advanced by the counsel for the appellant.

4. Mr. Parashar further submits that the appellate court has to see whether the just and fair compensation has been granted. He submits that in the present case, deceased died at the age of 41 years and was working as a labourer. He left behind young widow wife and five dependents children. The wife lost the association of her husband and pleasure of life. The children lost the love and affection, care and guidance of their father. Despite, the Ld. Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- each towards loss of consortium and loss of estate and Rs.5,000/- towards funeral expenses, which are on the lower side. However, no amount has been granted towards loss of love and affection.

5. Keeping in view the facts noted above, I am of the considered opinion that Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation towards non-pecuniary damages on the lower side. Thus, I award Rs.1,00,000/- each towards loss of love and affection and towards loss of consortium and Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses.

6. Consequently, the compensation comes as under:

Sl. Heads of Compensation Compensation No. Compensation granted by ld. granted by this Tribunal Court

1. Loss of Rs.11,34,000/- Rs.9,82,800/-

dependency

2. Loss of love and Nil Rs.1,00,000/-

affection

3. Loss of Rs.10,000/- Rs.1,00,000/-

Consortium Loss 4 of Estate Rs.10,000/- Rs.10,000/-

4.

     5.      For funeral         Rs.5,000/-            Rs.25,000/-
             charges
            TOTAL                Rs.11,59,000/-        Rs.12,17,800/-

Resultantly, the total compensation is assessed as Rs.12,17,800/-.

7. Accordingly, compensation amount is enhanced to Rs.58,800/- (Rs.12,17,800 - Rs.11,59,000).

8. The enhanced compensation shall carry interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.

9. The Appellant / Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount with the Registrar General of this Court within a period of six weeks from today, failing which, respondents / claimants shall be entitled for penal interest @ 12% per annum on account of delayed payment.

10. On deposit, the Registrar General is directed to release the amount in favour of the respondents / claimants in terms of the impugned award dated 16.08.2011 passed by the learned Tribunal on taking necessary steps by them.

11. The statutory amount be released in favour of the appellant.

12. In view of the above, the appeal is partially allowed.

SURESH KAIT, J

APRIL 16, 2014 jg

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter