Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5261 Del
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2012
$~A14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment:4th September, 2012
+ Co. Pet. No. 172/2012
PETITION UNDER SECTIONS 391(2) & 394
OF THE COMPANIES ACT,1956
IN THE MATTER OF
NICOL'S INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD ...Petitioner/
Transferor Company
AND
NICOLS INDIA PVT LTD ...Petitioner/
Transferee Company
Through : Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg &
Mr.Animesh K. Sinha,
Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy
Registrar of Companies, for the
Regional Director
(Northern Region)
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for
the Official Liquidator
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1. This second motion joint Petition has been filed under sections
391 & 394 of the companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner Transferor
Company and Transferee Company seeking sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation of Transferor Company - Nicol's International Private
Limited with Transferee Company Nicols India Private Limited.
2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Transferor Company and
Transferee Company are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction
of this Court.
3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Transferor and
Transferee Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid-up
capital have been given in the Petition.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as
the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2011
of the Transferor and Transferee Companies have also been enclosed
with the Petition.
5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the
Transferor and Transferee Companies approving the Scheme of
Amalgamation have also been placed on record.
6. It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to
251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner
Companies.
7. So far as the exchange ratio for amalgamation is concerned, the
Scheme provides that, upon the Scheme finally comes into effect, the
Transferee Company shall issue shares in the following manner:
1 Equity Share of Rs. 10/- each, credited as fully paid-up,
of the Transferee Company for every 10 Equity Share of Rs. 10/-
each held in the Transferor Company.
8. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 39 of
2012 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of
meetings. Vide order dated 15.03.2012, this Court allowed the
Application and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings
of Shareholders as well as the secured and unsecured creditors of the
Transferor and Transferee Company.
9. The Petitioner Transferor Company and the Transferee Company
have thereafter filed the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme
of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 23.04.2012, notice in the Petition
was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region and
the Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published in
'Business Standard' (English, Delhi Edition) and 'Jansatta' (Hindi,
Delhi Edition). Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by
the Petitioners showing compliance regarding service of the Petition on
the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, and
also regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspaper on
05.05.2012. Copies of the newspapers' cuttings, in original, containing
the publications have been filed along with the Affidavit of Service.
10. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the information
received, the official Liquidator has filed its report dated 09.08.2012
wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the
proposed Scheme from any person/party interested in the Scheme in any
manner and that the affairs of the Transferor Company do not appear to
have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its
members, creditors or to public interest.
11. In response to the notices issued in the Petition, Mr. B.K. Bansal,
Learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated 24.07.2012. Relying on
Clause 7 of the Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the
Transferor Company shall become the employees of the Transferee
Company without any break or interruption in their services upon
sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation by the Court.
12. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. Mr. S.P. Seth, Authorized Representative of the
Transferee Company and Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg, Learned Counsel for
Petitioner Companies, have filed an affidavit dated 09.08.2012,
confirming that the Petitioner Companies nor their Legal Counsel has
received any objection pursuant to citations published in the
newspapers.
13. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and
Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation/reports filed by
the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator,
attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation,
there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to
the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the
statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of the
order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the
date of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of sections 391
and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme , the
whole or part of the undertaking, the property, rights and powers of the
Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee
Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the
Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be
transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or deed.
Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Company shall
stand dissolved without winding up. It is, however, clarified that this
order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from
payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if payable in
accordance with any law; or permission/compliance with any other
requirement which may be specifically required under any law.
14. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that Petitioner
Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with the
Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from
today. The statement is accepted.
15. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order Dasti.
h
INDERMEET KAUR, J SEPTEMBER 04, 2012 rb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!