Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5247 Del
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2012
$~14
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on: 3rd September, 2012
+ MAC.APP. 54/2012
YACHNA KHARE & ORS. ..... Appellant
Through Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate
versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS .... Respondents
Through Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for the
Respondent No.1 Insurance
Company.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL
JUDGMENT
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `15,97,000/-
awarded in favour of the Appellants by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Pankaj Batish who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 03.10.2008.
2. The only ground of challenge is that the deceased's future prospects were not taken into consideration.
3. On 27.04.2012, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the Respondent Insurance Company that perhaps some amount towards bonus was included in the salary certificate Ex.PW1/6. By an order dated 27.04.2012, this Court directed the Appellant to
produce a witness from the deceased's employer to seek clarification about the deceased's income.
4. Statement of Anil Kumar Gautam, Senior Manager(Personnel) was recorded before the Registrar on 20.07.2012. It is established that the deceased joined M/s Bhushan Power and Steels Ltd. in the year 2002. His salary of `5,000/- in April, 2006 (Ex.AW1/6) increased to `10,000/- at the time of his death in this accident in October, 2008. The deceased was aged 28 years on the date of the accident. The Appellants would be entitled to an addition of 50% in the income to compute the loss of dependency. A sum of `1,740/- which was reflected in the salary certificate Ex.PW1/6 was annual bonus which shall be included in the annual income as against the monthly income taken by the Claims Tribunal. The loss of dependency would thus come to `20,59,720/-(`10,000/- + 50% x 12 + 1740/- x 2/3 x 17).
5. In addition, the Appellants would be entitled to a sum of `25,000/-
towards loss of love and affection and `10,000/- each towards loss of consortium, loss to estate and funeral expenses.
6. The overall compensation thus comes to `21,14,720/-.
7. The compensation is thus enhanced by `4,68,080/- which shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of the filing of the Petition till its payment.
8. Twenty five percent each of the enhanced compensation shall be payable to the Appellants No.2 and 3. Rest 50% of the enhanced amount shall be payable to the First Appellant.
9. Eighty percent of the amount payable to the First Appellant shall be held in fixed deposit for a period of two years, four years, six
years, eight years and ten years. Rest shall be released to her on deposit. 50% of the amount payable to the Appellants No.2 and 3 shall be held in fixed deposit for a period of two years. Rest shall be released to them on deposit.
10. The Respondent No.1 Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation in the name of the Appellants in UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch within six weeks.
11. The Appeal is allowed in above terms.
12. Pending Applications stand disposed of.
(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 03, 2012 pst
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!