Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Samaya Investment & Trading ... vs ----
2012 Latest Caselaw 6154 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 6154 Del
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2012

Delhi High Court
M/S Samaya Investment & Trading ... vs ---- on 12 October, 2012
Author: Indermeet Kaur
$~18
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                         Date of Judgment:12.10.2012

+            COMPANY PETITION NO. 280 OF 2012


IN THE MATTER OF

M/S SAMAYA INVESTMENT & TRADING PVT. LTD. & ORS.
                                   .......PETITIONERS

             Through:   Mr. Arvind Biswal and Mr. Rohit Gandhi,
                        Advocates for petitioner-companies.
                        Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of
                        Companies for Regional Director, Northern
                        Region.
                        Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for the
                        Official Liquidator.

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1. This second motion joint Petition has been filed under Sections

391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short "Act")

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation (for short

"Scheme") of M/S SAMAYA INVESTMENT & TRADING

PRIVATE LIMITED (Transferor Company No.l), M/S

LUCRATIVE LEASING FINANCE & INVESTMENT CO.

LTD. (Transferor Company No. 2), with M/S PARTEEK

FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED

(Transferee Company).

2. The registered offices of the Transferor and Transferee Companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Transferor and

Transferee Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and

paid-up capital have been given in the Petition.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as

the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March,

2011 of the Transferor and Transferee Companies have also been

enclosed with the Petition.

5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the

Transferor and Transferee Companies approving the Scheme have

also been placed on record.

6. It has been submitted that no proceeding under Sections 235 to

251 of the Act is pending against the Petitioner Companies.

7. So far as the share exchange ratio for Scheme of Amalgamation is

concerned, the Scheme provides that, upon the Scheme finally

coming into effect, the Transferee Company shall issue shares in

the following manner:-

50 (Fifty) Equity Share(s) of the face value of Rs. 10/-

(Rupees Ten) each credited as fully paid up in the share

capital of Transferee Company as on the Effective Date for

every 11 (Eleven) fully paid Equity Share(s) of the face

value of Rs. 100/- (Rupees Hundred) each held in

Transferor Company No. 1.

1 (One) Equity share(s) of the face value of Rupees 10/-

(Rupees Ten) each credited as fully paid up in the share

capital of the Transferee Company for every 1 (One) fully

paid up Equity Share(s) of the face value of Rs. 10/-

(Rupees Ten) each held in Transferor Company No. 2.

The Share Valuation Report certifying the Fair Exchange Ratio of

the Equity Shares for the merger of the Petitioner Companies has

also been placed on record.

8. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 92 of

2012 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation of meetings

of shareholders and creditors. Vide order dated 25th May, 2012,

this Court allowed the Application and dispensed with the

requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders and creditors

of all the Transferor and Transferee Companies.

9. The Petitioner Companies have thereafter filed the present

Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme. Vide order dated 31st

May 2012 notice of the Petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator.

Notice was duly accepted on behalf of the Regional Director and

the Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be

published in "Indian Express" (English Edition) and "Dainik

Jagran" (Hindi Edition). Affidavits of Publication have been filed

by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding publication of

citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 15.06.2012. Copies of

the newspapers cuttings, in original, containing the publications

have been filed along with the Affidavit of Publication.

10. Pursuant to the notice issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the Petitioner Companies. Based on the

information received, the Official Liquidator has filed his report

on 23.08.12. Relying on Clause 12.1 of the Scheme, the Official

Liquidator has stated that the authorized share capital of the

Transferor Companies shall be merged and added to the

authorized share capital of the Transferee Company. In his report,

the Official Liquidator has stated that he has not received any

complaint against the proposed Scheme from any person/party

interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the

Transferor Company No. 1 & 2 do not appear to have been

conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members

or to public interest as per the second proviso of Section 394(1) of

the Companies Act, 1956.

11. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, Mr. Rakesh

Chandra, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of

Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit on 24.08.2012. Relying

on Clause 8.1 of Part-II of the Scheme, he has stated that all the

employees of the Transferor Companies shall become the

employees of the Transferee Company without any break or

interruption in their services upon sanctioning of the Scheme by

the Court. The Regional Director has further stated that para 6 of

Part II of the Scheme provide the Accounting Treatment in detail,

which is in accordance with Accounting Standard issued by the

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The Regional

Director has further submitted that M/s Samaya Investment &

Trading Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor Company No.1) is a non-banking

finance company and registered with the Reserve Bank of India

and according to Circular No. RBI/2005-06/285, DNBS (PD)

C.C. No. 63/02.02/2005-06 dated 24.01.2006, the non-banking

finance company needs to inform Reserve Bank of India within

1(one) month from the date of order of court about amalgamation.

12. No objection has been received to the, Scheme from any other

party. Learned counsel for Petitioner Companies has submitted

that the Petitioner Companies have filed affidavit of Mr. Sunny

Varghese, Director of Transferee Company dated 31.08.2012

confirming that neither the Petitioner Companies nor their

counsel has received any objection pursuant to citations published

in the newspapers. Further, in the said affidavit, the Petitioner

Companies have specifically undertaken to comply with the

requirement of informing the Reserve Bank of India within 30

days from the date of order of the Court about amalgamation, as

mentioned by the Regional Director in his report. Subsequently,

an additional affidavit dated 09.10.2012 has been filed on behalf

of the Petitioner Companies reaffirming that no objections have

been received by the Petitioner Companies or their counsels as on

the date of filing of the additional affidavit.

13. Even today, Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Deputy Registrar of Companies

appearing for Regional Director, Northern Region and Ruchi

Sindhwani, learned counsel for Official Liquidator state that they

have no objection to the present Scheme being sanctioned.

14. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and

Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; affidavit/report filed by the

Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator,

attached with this Court to the proposed Scheme, there appears to

be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme.

Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme under

Sections 391 and 394 of the Act. The Petitioner Companies will

comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law

including informing the Reserve Bank of India within 30 days of

this order about the amalgamation. Certified copy of the order be

filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date

of receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391

and 394 of the Act and in terms of the Scheme, the whole of the

undertaking, the properties, rights and powers of the Transferor

Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company

without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme,

all the liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be

transferred to the Transferee Company without any further act or

deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect, the Transferor

Company shall stand dissolved without winding up. It is, however,

clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting

exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other

charges, if payable in accordance with any law; or

permission/compliance with any other requirement which may be

specifically required under any law.

15. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, states that the Petitioner

Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/; with

the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three

weeks from today. The said statement is accepted.

16. The Petition is allowed in the above terms. Order dasti.

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

OCTOBER 12, 2012 nandan

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter