Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Icici Lombard General Insurance ... vs Kusum & Ors
2012 Latest Caselaw 3435 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3435 Del
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2012

Delhi High Court
Icici Lombard General Insurance ... vs Kusum & Ors on 22 May, 2012
Author: G.P. Mittal
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                           Date of decision:22nd May, 2012

+       MAC.APP. 377/2012

        ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
                                           ..... Appellant
                      Through: Ms.Rameeza Hakeem and
                               Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocates.

                       versus

        KUSUM & ORS                                      ..... Respondents
                                Through:   None.

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL

                                JUDGMENT

G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `7,30,200/-

awarded for the death of Anubhav Tyagi, a bachelor aged 25 years in an accident which occurred on 17.09.2009.

2. None appears on behalf of Respondents No. 1 and 2 despite service of notice of Appeal. The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that there is no breach of terms of policy, therefore, service of Respondents No. 3 and 4 is dispensed with.

3. The only ground of challenge is that in a petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act), compensation

has to be granted in accordance with the structured formula as given in Schedule-II to the Motor Vehicles Act.

4. The issue is no longer res integra. This Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Pitamber & Ors. (MAC APP. 304/2009 decided on 23.01.2012) after analyzing the various judgments of this Court and the judgments of Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Hansrajbhai V. Kodala 2001 (5) SCC 175 and Deepal Girishbhai Soni v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2004) 5 SCC 385 held that in a petition under Section 163-A of the Act the compensation towards loss of dependency and non-pecuniary heads has to be granted in accordance with the structured formula as given in Schedule-II of the Motor Vehicles Act.

5. In view of this, loss of dependency comes to `4,53,400/-

(40,000 x 2/3 x 17). The Appellants are entitled to compensation of `2,000/- towards funeral expenses and `2,500/- towards loss to estate. The overall compensation thus comes to `4,57,900/-.

6. The compensation is thus reduced from `7,30,200/- to `4,57,900/-. This amount shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum as awarded by the Claims Tribunal. The Appellant/Insurance Company has not yet deposited the amount of compensation in terms of the order dated 13.04.2012. Let the amount of `4,57,900/- along with interest be deposited with the Claims Tribunal within six weeks.

7. The deceased was a bachelor, 75% of the compensation

awarded shall go to the Respondent No.1 and 25% to the Respondent No.2. 60% from the amount awarded shall be held in Fixed Deposit for a period of three years. Rest of the amount shall be released forthwith.

8. On filing of proof of deposit of the awarded amount with the Claims Tribunal within eight weeks, the statutory deposit of `25,000/- shall be refunded to the Appellant/Insurance Company.

9. The Appeal is allowed in above terms.

10. No costs.

(G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE MAY 22, 2012 mr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter