Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 1799 Del
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 15th March, 2012
+ W.P.(C) NO.2803/2010
DHARMENDRA KUMAR RAGHAV ... Petitioner
versus
UOI & ORS. .....Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogender Mishra and Mr. Rajesh
Kumar Katiyar, Advocates
For Respondents : Mr. D.S.Mahendru and Mr. Anuj Agarwal,
Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J.(ORAL)
+WP(C) No. 2803/2010
*
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the
petition has become infructuous and he does not wish to press it any further.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
CM Nos. 5604/2010 & 20433/2010 in WP(C) No. 2803/2010
In view of the orders passed in the writ petition, these
applications have become infructuous and the same are disposed of as such.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. MARCH 15, 2012 sl
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!