Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 192 Del
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.5747/2011 & CM No.11702/2011
% Date of Decision: 10.01.2012
Ex. RFN Om Lat .... Petitioner
Through Nemo
Versus
Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Ms.Kanika Agnihotri & Mr.Parikshit
Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R.MIDHA
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* On the first call, a pass-over was prayed on behalf of the counsel
for the petitioner on the ground that the counsel has been held up in
the traffic jam. On second call, still the counsel for the petitioner was
not available. The matter was passed over again. On the third call,
again no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It is now 13:00
hrs.
The record also reveals that the show cause notice has not been
issued in the matter and the matter has been adjourned since 10th
August, 2011 at the instance of the counsel for the petitioner.
In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to
dismiss the writ petition in default of appearance of the petitioner and
his counsel.
Dismissed in default.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
J.R.MIDHA, J.
January 10, 2012 rs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!