Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 734 Del
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.8640/2011
% Date of Decision: 02.02.2012
Mukesh Kumar .... Petitioner
Through None.
Versus
Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Ravinder Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
No one is present on behalf of petitioner.
The learned counsel for the respondents on instructions states
that the commandant of 90th Battalion, CRPF, Bijbehera (ANGO),
J&K had received a signal dated 21st December, 2011 conveying the
approval of competent authority for reinstatement of Mukesh Kumar
son of Sh.Ashok Singh, Village Vidhipur, Post Office Karouta, District
Patna. Pursuant to the said intimation the commandant of the said
Battalion had communicated to the petitioner Mukesh Kumar the
approval of competent authority for his reinstatement in the service
and he was directed to resume duty at Unit Headquarter 90th
Battalion, Bijbehera, District Anantnag (J&K) immediately vide
communication dated 13th January, 2012. The learned counsel for
the respondents has also produced the copy of letter dated 13th
January, 2012 addressed to No.031415747 Ex-Ct/GD Mukesh
Kumar, petitioner, which is taken on record.
Since no one is present on behalf of petitioner, the writ petition
is dismissed in default. The application for interim order is also
disposed of.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
February 02, 2012 'k'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!