Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Green Industries Private Limited ... vs ..........................
2012 Latest Caselaw 7221 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 7221 Del
Judgement Date : 17 December, 2012

Delhi High Court
Green Industries Private Limited ... vs .......................... on 17 December, 2012
Author: Indermeet Kaur
39
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                          Date of Judgment:17.12.2012

              (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

COMPANY APPLICATION (M) No. 188 OF 2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956)

SECTIONS 391 & 394
AND

IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT FOR DE-
MERGER OF REAL ESTATE DIVISION OF GREEN
INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED

                         IN THE MATTER OF

GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE                APPLICANT/DEMERG
LIMITED                                  ED COMPANY NO. 1

                             AND

BERRY PROJECTS             PRIVATE APPLICANT/RESULTA
LIMITED                                  NT COMPANY


              Through:   Mr. Mukesh Sukhija Advocate for the
                         Applicants


       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR


C.P. No.188/2012                                 Page 1 of 4
 INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement for de-merger of Real Estate Division of GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Demerged Company) into BERRY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (Resultant Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.

2. The registered offices of both the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company is situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Demerged Company and Resultant Company, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been given in the Application.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 st March, 2012 of both the Applicant Companies have also been enclosed with the Application.

5. Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submitted that no proceedings under sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against any of the Applicant Companies as on the date of the present Application.

6. The proposed Scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of both the Applicant Companies. Copies of the Board Resolutions have been filed along with the Application.

7. The status of the Shareholders, Secured and Un-secured Creditors of the Demerged and Resultant Company and the consents obtained from them for the proposed Scheme is clearly apparent from the chart given in the application which is as below:

 Company           No. of Consent No. of Consent          No. of    Consent
                   Share   Given   Secure     Given         Un-     Given
               holders               d                   secured
                                   Credit               Creditor
                                    ors                       s
 Demerged
 Company             7       7      NIL        N.A.           6        6


 Resultant
 Company             2       2      NIL        N.A.           2        2




8. A prayer has been made for dispensation of the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders and Creditors of the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company.

9. In view of the written consents/NOC given, the requirement of convening meetings of Shareholders of the Demerged Company and the Resultant Company are dispensed with.

10. That the Un-secured Creditors of both the Applicant Companies have given their written consents/NOC to the proposed Scheme. Accordingly, the requirement of convening meeting of Un-secured Creditors of both the Applicant Companies is also dispensed with. Further, the Applicant Companies do not have any Secured Creditors, accordingly there is no requirement of convening the meetings of the Secured Creditors of the Applicant Companies.

11. The Application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Order Dasti.

INDERMEET KAUR, J DECEMBER 17, 2012 nandan

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter