Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 7024 Del
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment: 7.12.2012
Company Petition No. 385 of 2012
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/S. REXCEL PHARMACEUTICALS LTD & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through : Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Amit
Mishra and Mr. Siddharth
Dutta, Advocates for the
Petitioners.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
This Second Motion joint Petition has been filed under Sections
391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 seeking sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation of (i) Rexcel Pharmaceuticals Limited (Transferor
Company No. 1); (ii) Solus Pharmaceuticals Limited (Transferor
Company No. 2); (iii) Ranbaxy Drugs and Chemical Company
(Transferor Company No. 3); (iv) Ranbaxy Life Sciences Research
Limited (Transferor Company No. 4); and (iv) Ranbaxy SEZ Limited
(Transferor Company No. 5) into Ranbaxy Drugs Limited (Transferee)
and their respective Shareholders and Creditors.
The registered office of Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2
and 3 are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
The registered office of Transferor Companies No. 4, 5 and the
Transferee Company are situated at Mohali and are duly registered with
the Registrar of Companies at Chandigarh.
Details with regard to the date of incorporation of
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 their authorized, issued,
subscribed and paid up capital have been mentioned in the Petition.
Copies of the Memorandum & Articles of Association as well as
the latest Audited Annual Report as on December 30, 2011 of
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 have also been enclosed
with the Petition.
Copies of the Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 dated March 12, 2012
approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also been placed on
record.
It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235-251
of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3.
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 had earlier filed
C.A. (Main) No. 99 of 2012 seeking dispensation of the meeting of
shareholders as well as the secured and unsecured creditors of
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3. Vide order dated July
04, 2012, this Court allowed the application and dispensed with the
requirement of convening meetings of the shareholders as well as the
secured and unsecured creditors of Petitioner/Transferor Companies No.
1, 2 and 3. Also, vide order dated May 31, 2012, the Hon'ble Punjab &
Haryana High Court had allowed the first motion filed by Transferor
Companies No. 4, 5 and the Transferee Company.
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 have thereafter
filed the present Petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation. Vide order dated August 22, 2012, notice of the Petition
was directed to be issued to the Regional Director (Northern Region)
and the Official Liquidator. Citations were also directed to be published
in Times of India (English Edition) and Jansatta (Hindi Edition) and the
Official Gazette of Delhi. Affidavit of service and publication has been
filed by Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 showing
compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional Director
(Northern Region) and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding
publication in the aforesaid newspapers on September 26, 2012 in Times
of India (English Edition) and in Jansatta (Hindi Edition) and on
October 12, 2012 in Official Gazette of Delhi. Copies of the newspaper
cuttings and the Official Gazette of Delhi in original containing the
publications have been filed along with the affidavit of service.
Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator has filed his
report dated December 05, 2012 wherein he has stated that he has not
received any complaint against the proposed Scheme from any
person/party interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs
of Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 do not appear to have
been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members,
creditors or to public interest as per the second proviso of Section 394
(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
In response to the notices issued in the Petition, Mr. Rakesh
Chandra, Learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of
Corporate Affairs has also filed his affidavit/report dated October 10,
2012. Relying on Clause 5.1.1 (iii) of the Scheme of Amalgamation, the
affidavit states that all the Transferor & Transferee Companies may be
asked to obtain 'No Objection' from the concerned regulators which
have issued permits, license, quotas, permissions to the Transferor
Companies as stated at para 5.1.1 (iii) of the Scheme.
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 have filed
affidavit dated December 05, 2012 stating that Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 does not have any license, permits, quotas,
approvals, permissions, registrations etc., as stipulated in Para 5.1.1.(iii)
of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Petitioner/Transferor Companies No.
1, 2 and 3 have further undertaken to comply with Para 5.1.1.(iii) of the
Scheme of Amalgamation and obtain no-objection certificate from the
authority concerned, as may be required under the applicable law.
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 have thus explained the
compliance of Para 5.1.1. (iii) of the Scheme of Amalgamation.
Also, no other objections have been received to the Scheme of
Amalgamation from any other party. Mr. Sandip Mehandroo,
authorized representative of Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2
and 3 has filed an affidavit dated December 07, 2012 stating that
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 nor their counsel have
received any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers
and Official Gazette of Delhi.
In view of the no-objection / approval accorded by the
shareholders and creditors of Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2
and 3 and the reports filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region
and the Official Liquidator attached with this Court to the proposed
Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the
grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 will comply with the statutory requirements
in accordance with law. Certified copy of the order be filed with the
Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of the
same. In terms of the provisions of Section 391 and 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme, the whole or part of
the undertaking, the property, rights and powers of Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 be transferred to and vest in the Transferee
Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the
Scheme, all the liabilities and duties of Petitioner/Transferor Companies
No. 1, 2 and 3 be transferred to the Transferee Company without any
further act or deed. Upon the Scheme coming into effect,
Petitioner/Transferor Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 shall stand dissolved
without winding up. It is, however, clarified that this order will not be
construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty
or taxes or any other charges, if payable in accordance with any law or
permission/compliance with any other requirement which may be
specifically required under any law.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners state that Petitioner/Transferor
Companies No. 1, 2 and 3 would voluntarily deposit a total sum of Rs.
1,00,000/- with the common pool fund of the Official Liquidator within
three weeks from today. The statement is accepted.
The Petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J DECEMBER 7, 2012 A
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!