Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5100 Del
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) No. 779/2002
% 29th August, 2012
SMT. SHANTI DEVI & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate.
Versus
UNITED BANK OF INDIA ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Advocate with Mr. Atul
Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs/landlords for possession and mesne
profits with respect to tenanted premises being the ground floor (1838 sq. ft) and
basement (2362 sq. ft.) situated at plot No.84, Nehru Place, New Delhi. The last
paid rent for the tenanted premises from March, 1993 was at ` 36,458.52/-. The
tenancy was terminated by means of a notice dated 9.3.2001 with effect from
1.4.2001. The suit premises were vacated during the pendency of the suit on
10.8.2002. This Court is therefore only called upon to decide the rate of mesne
profits payable w.e.f. 1.4.2001 to 10.8.2002.
CS(OS) 779/2002 Page 1 of 5
2. It is not disputed on behalf of the defendant that the notice dated
9.3.2001 was served upon it terminating the tenancy w.e.f. 1.4.2001.
3. The following issues were framed in this suit on 12.1.2006:-
"1. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to ` 45, 41,230/- (minus `
1093755.60p already paid) by way of damages/mesne
profits/compensation for use and occupation of the demised premises for
the period 1.4.2001 upto 14.3.2002? OPP
2. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to damages/mesne
profits/compensation for use and occupation w.e.f., 15.3.2002 to
10.8.2002 @ ` 3,50,000/- per month. OPP
3. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to interest on rent w.e.f., on the
rent due @ 15% p.a. OPP
4. Whether the plaintiffs entered into agreement waiving off their
claims as pleaded in the written statement? OPD
5. To what relief/s the plaintiff is entitled to
6. Relief"
Issue Nos.1 and 2
4. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs has relied upon Ex.P6, and which is
a letter written by the defendant bank dated 31.10.1997 annexing therewith its
letter dated 27.10.1997. The relevant portion of this letter dated 27.10.1997 reads
as under:-
"The Manager,
United Bank of India,
Nehru Place Branch
Dear Sir,
Reg: Proposal for revision of Rent and Renewal of Lease Agreement of
your Branch Premises and Sanction of Term Loan.
CS(OS) 779/2002 Page 2 of 5
We are glad to inform you that Competent Authority of the Bank has
approved the above proposal on the following terms and conditions:
1. Initial revised rent is fixed at ` 48.00 and ` 22.00 per sft/per month
in respect of ground floor and basement area measuring 1838 sft and 2362
sft, respectively, under occupation of the Branch. The above revised rent
is inclusive of all present and future rates, taxes and other out-goings
alongwith fresh imposition, if any.
2. The initial revised rent will come into effect from 01.03.1997 and
will remain valid upto 28.02.2001 alongwith payment of arrear of
enhanced rent.
3. The above rent would be subject to, further, revision during the
next 2 successive terms of 3 years each, in the following manner:
a) With effect from 01.03.2001, the rent of the ground floor and
basement area is to be revised at ` 70.00 and ` 35.00 per sft/per month
inclusive of all rates and taxes, respectively.
b) With effect from 01.03.2004, the rent of the ground floor and the
basement area will be revised @ ` 100.00 and ` 50.00 per sft/per month
inclusive of all rates and taxes and the same is to remain valid for another
period of 3 years ending on 28.02.2007.
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx" (underlining added)
5. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that mesne profits therefore be
granted at the rates specified in para 3(a) of this letter. Learned counsel for the
defendant could not dispute that this letter Ex.P6 was in fact accompanied by the
letter dated 27.10.1997 and which contained the proposed payment of rental
charges of this very premises, however, which proposal could not go through. In
my opinion, even if this proposal did not go through, the very fact that the
defendant admitted that it was ready and willing to pay rent at the rate specified in
paras 3(a) and 3(b) of this letter shows that mesne profits at this rate can be
granted.
CS(OS) 779/2002 Page 3 of 5
6. In view of the above, the issue Nos.1 and 2 are disposed of by
holding that the plaintiffs will be entitled to rent @ ` 70/- per sq. ft/per month for
the ground floor area of 1838 sq. ft and at ` 35/- per sq. ft/per month for the
basement area of 2362 sq. ft. from 1.4.2001 to 10.8.2002. Of course, whatever
amount the defendant has paid to the plaintiffs during this period, adjustment of
this amount will be given by the plaintiffs to the defendant and which aspect will
be seen, if so required, at the stage of execution proceedings.
Issue No.4
7. Issue No.4 is very fairly not pressed on behalf of the defendant.
Issue No.3
8. Issue No.3 is with respect to interest which would be payable on the
arrears of mesne profits. The Supreme Court in the case of Indian Oil
Corporation vs. Saroj Baweja 2005(12) SCC 298 has held that interest can be
granted on arrears of mesne profits. Accordingly, following the judgment of the
Supreme Court, I grant interest @ 12% per annum simple from the end of the
month for which mesne profits are payable till the amount is actually paid. It is
further clarified that since certain payments have already been made by the
defendant to the plaintiffs, an appropriate chart will be prepared showing each
month's due and each month's payment, and interest will only be payable on the
balance amount due.
CS(OS) 779/2002 Page 4 of 5
Issue No.3 is disposed of accordingly.
Relief
9. In view of the above, the suit of the plaintiffs is decreed for mesne
profits against the defendant @ ` 70/- per sq. ft/per month for the ground floor area
of 1838 sq. ft and at ` 35/- per sq. ft/per month for the basement area of 2362 sq. ft.
of the tenanted premises situated at plot No.84, Nehru Place, New Delhi from
1.4.2001 to 10.8.2002. Plaintiffs will also be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum
simple on the arrears of mesne profits. The defendant will be granted adjustment
for the amount received by it for the period for which mesne profits are granted.
Interest will only be payable to the plaintiffs for the balance amount due for each
month and till actual payment. Plaintiffs will also be entitled to costs in terms of
the rules of this Court. Suit is disposed of accordingly. Decree sheet be prepared.
AUGUST 29, 2012 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
Ne
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!