Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Baba Infotech Private Limited vs ----
2012 Latest Caselaw 5047 Del

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5047 Del
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2012

Delhi High Court
Baba Infotech Private Limited vs ---- on 27 August, 2012
Author: Indermeet Kaur
$~17
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                              Date of Judgment:27th August, 2012

+      CO. PET. 216/2012 connected with Co. APPL.(M) No. 32/2012

          IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
    AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
           391 TO 394 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND
        THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF AMALGAMATION OF


BABA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED                       .... Petitioner/
                                                    Transferor Company
                        With

GOODIE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner/
                                         Transferee Company
             Through Mr Ashish Middha,
                      Advocate for the Petitioners
                      Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Dy. Registrar,
                      Registrar of Companies for the
                     Regional Director.
   CORAM:
    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)

1. This joint Petition has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner Companies seeking sanction to

the Scheme of Amalgamation of Baba Infotech Private Limited,

Petitioner/ Transferor Company with Goodie International Private

Limited.

2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at

New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Petitioner

Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have

been given in the Petition.

4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as

the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31st March, 2011

of the Petitioner Companies have also been enclosed with the Petition.

5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the

Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also

been placed on record.

6. It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to

251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner

Companies.

7. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed CA (M) 32 of 2012

seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of meetings.

Vide order dated 28th February, 2012, this Court allowed the Application

and requirement of convening all the meetings of Shareholders and

Creditors of the Transferor Company and of the Transferee Company

were dispensed with.

8. The Petitioner Companies had thereafter filed the present Petition

seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated

11th May, 2012, notice of the Petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator attached

with this Court. Citations were also directed to be published in

"Business Standard" in English and "Jansatta" in Hindi Edition and the

same were published on August 18, 2012 as per the orders of the court.

Affidavit of Service and Publication has been filed by the Petitioners

showing compliance regarding service of the Petition on the Regional

Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator, Delhi and also

regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspaper. Copies of

the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have also

been filed along with the Affidavit of Service.

9. In response to the notice issued in the Petition, Mr Rakesh

Chandra, Learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of

Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit/Report dated 23rd August,

2012. Relying on the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that, upon

sanction of the Scheme, all the employees of the Transferor entity shall

become the employees of the Transferee Company without any break or

interruption in their services. The Learned Regional Director has

submitted that the Central Government has no objection to the proposed

Scheme of Amalgamation. Official Liquidator has also filed its report

dated 24th August, 2012 which has no objection.

10. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. Mr. Rishi Madan, Director of the Petitioner

Companies has filed an affidavit confirming that neither the Petitioner

Companies nor their Counsel has received any objection pursuant to

citations published in the newspapers.

11. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and

Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation filed by the

Regional Director, Northern Region and no objection by the Official

Liquidator, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be

no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation.

Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of

Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory requirements

in accordance with law. Certified copy of the formal order be filed with

the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of receipt of

the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391 and 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956, all the property, rights and powers of the

Transferor Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee

Company without any further act or deed. Similarly, all the liabilities

and duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the Transferee

Company without any further act or deed. It is, however, clarified that

this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from

payment of stamp duty or any other charges, if payable, in accordance

with any law; or permission/compliance with any other requirement

which may be specifically required under any law.

12. The Petitioner Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs.

1,00,000/- in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within

three weeks from today.

13. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.

Order Dasti.

AUGUST 27, 2012/rb                           INDERMEET KAUR, J

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter